The [new] list of the Language committee [1] is now open for read-only
subscribers. The new archives will be open.
During the previous two years any valid member of the community could
apply for observer status. Since a week ago, everybody can follow the
list.
(I'm not quite sure if this
Wonderful. Thank you for the update, Milos.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
The [new] list of the Language committee [1] is now open for read-only
subscribers. The new archives will be open.
During the previous two years any valid member of the
On 17.04.2013 10:42, Milos Rancic wrote:
The [new] list of the Language committee [1] is now open for read-only
subscribers. The new archives will be open.
During the previous two years any valid member of the community could
apply for observer status. Since a week ago, everybody can follow the
Hello Tomasz,
We do need a more active public discussion about the WMF budget. Both
before and after it is approved. (The best input to the next year's
plan is often input on what is happening in the current year; and
continuous feedback that reaches some resolution is more helpful than
a burst
Thank you David, for another excellent update.
Sam.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:00 PM, David Parreño Mont - Comunicació
comunica...@wikimedia.cat wrote:
Dear fellows,
The following message is just to keep you informed about the activities
developed during the last month by Amical Viquipèdia.
Thanks a lot for sharing! I didn't reply yet, because I didn't have had
time to read through it properly (hopefully next week)
2013/4/11 Plyd wiki.vinc...@amplyd.com
Hi,
It looks like nobody received this email, so I try again!
Vincent
-- Forwarded message --
From: Plyd
don't hesitate if you have any question, I don't have it for english
wikipedia, but it is easy to do!
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
Thanks a lot for sharing! I didn't reply yet, because I didn't have had
time to read through it properly (hopefully
Hi everyone,
WMF researchers have agreed to participate in an office hour about WMF research
projects and methodologies.
The currently scheduled participants are:
* Aaron Halfaker, Research Analyst (contractor)
* Jonathan Morgan, Research Strategist (contractor)
* Evan Rosen, Data
Hi all,
Last week I noticed a nice design for the list info page of the WLM-US
mailing list that I tweaked for this mailing list:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-l
What do you think? Mentally replace all instance of cabal-l with
wikimedia-l and compare to
Op-ed: How do we fix RfA inactivity?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-04-15/Op-ed
News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-04-15/News_and_notes
Featured content: The featured process swings
You mean, there is a cabal-l? How I wish I was invited! ;-)
On 17 April 2013 21:30, Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Last week I noticed a nice design for the list info page of the WLM-US
mailing list that I tweaked for this mailing list:
Beautiful! Instant love (not that difficult actually, compared to the
dated default Mailman design).
On 04/17/2013 01:30 PM, Thehelpfulone wrote:
Any objections to changing it?
No objections to have this design becoming the new standard for all our
lists. :)
Or at least you are welcome
Thehelpfulone wrote:
Last week I noticed a nice design for the list info page of the WLM-US
mailing list that I tweaked for this mailing list:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-l
Unquestionably a major improvement over the default mailman theme. I'm not
sure I love the black
We can debate the details, but the principle of giving the front end a lick
of paint appeals.
What would make me very happy would be changes in the administrative
interface, which currently reminds me of the old Honeywell 6000 series I
first used.
Alex
2013/4/17 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
I am wondering why there is no tweet this page capability through the
WMF sites? It is so widely available through the web, and here is a range
of sites that would be a prime place to do it, and NADA, no capacity.
Even if we had it for something like https://blog.wikimedia.org/ would be
a good
Discussion about this has occurred on en.wiki at least multiple times,
info can be found here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Perennial_proposals#Share_pages_on_Facebook.2C_Twitter_etc.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
On blog.wikimedia.org, some social media sharing buttons will be
implemented (in a privacy-friendly way) as part of the upcoming
redesign.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:28 PM, billinghurst billinghu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering why there is no tweet this page capability through the
WMF sites?
I tend to think that they can be incredibly useful and reader friendly. I've
always found it a bit disappointing we don't have it as they are probably the
bigger reader request I've ever seen. That said I know that enWiki has had
multiple discussions about it ending in failure. The issues
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:00 PM, James Alexander
jalexan...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I tend to think that they can be incredibly useful and reader friendly.
I've always found it a bit disappointing we don't have it as they are
probably the bigger reader request I've ever seen. That said I know that
19 matches
Mail list logo
