On 2 May 2013 04:06, shi zhao shiz...@gmail.com wrote:
see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/
As usual, Orlowski is trolling for clicks. Here's the actual text:
http://niaccurshi.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/orphan-works-enterprise-and-regulatory.html
- d.
If the Register hates it, that usually indicates to me that it is a
fantastic idea.
On 02/05/2013 1:07 PM, shi zhao shiz...@gmail.com wrote:
see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/
The Act contains changes to UK copyright law which permit the
commercial exploitation of
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Craig Franklin
cfrank...@halonetwork.net wrote:
If the Register hates it, that usually indicates to me that it is a
fantastic idea.
The main issues with the EU orphan works directive is that projects
like Wikipedia are not among the priviledged entities and the
News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-04-29/News_and_notes
In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-04-29/In_the_media
On 2 May 2013 07:54, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
...
If that's it, the law is completely useless, it just parrots general EU
regulations. The big question in Europe is what qualifies as a diligent
search: I don't know if as usual UK wants to decide on its own, in any case
it
On 2 May 2013 07:54, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
If that's it, the law is completely useless, it just parrots general EU
regulations. The big question in Europe is what qualifies as a diligent
search: I don't know if as usual UK wants to decide on its own, in any
case it
On 2 May 2013 04:06, shi zhao shiz...@gmail.com wrote:
see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/
Dude this is Wikimedia-l. Home to rather a lot of copyright nerds. If there
was actually a significant problem with the law don't you think we would
have raised the issue back
I've discussed this issue in my state of the movement presentation [1]
summing up our experiences so far.
Balazs
[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:State_of_WMHU.pdf
2013.05.02. 0:36, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com ezt írta:
2013/5/1 Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com:
True.
Congrats from WMHU and thanks for the mug! :)
Balázs
2013/5/2 Tonmoy Khan tonmoy...@gmail.com
Congratulations to WMUK London! Wish all the success for Wikimania 2014.
Cheers
Tonmoy
On May 2, 2013 4:07 AM, Charles Gregory wmau.li...@chuq.net wrote:
Congratulations WMUK and the London
2013/5/2 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
On 2 May 2013 04:06, shi zhao shiz...@gmail.com wrote:
see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/
As usual, Orlowski is trolling for clicks. Here's the actual text:
Fae, 02/05/2013 09:20:
On 2 May 2013 07:54, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
...
If that's it, the law is completely useless, it just parrots general EU
regulations. The big question in Europe is what qualifies as a diligent
search: I don't know if as usual UK wants to decide on its own, in any case
2013/5/2 geni geni...@gmail.com:
On 2 May 2013 04:06, shi zhao shiz...@gmail.com wrote:
see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/
Dude this is Wikimedia-l. Home to rather a lot of copyright nerds. If there
was actually a significant problem with the law don't you think
On 2 May 2013 08:37, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2013 07:54, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
If that's it, the law is completely useless, it just parrots general EU
regulations. The big question in Europe is what qualifies as a diligent
search: I don't know if as
On 2 May 2013 08:40, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously I've seen this topic floating around on various photography
sites. Any idea who is behind the campaign and why?
The same photography groups who think people shouldn't be allowed to
release pictures under CC by-sa as it undermines
On 2 May 2013 10:54, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2013 08:37, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2013 07:54, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
If that's it, the law is completely useless, it just parrots general EU
regulations. The big question in Europe
On 2 May 2013 11:24, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
However orphan works legislation is a hack designed to allow long copyright
terms to keep working without upsetting even more people. Its of no use to
us.
I think you're wrong there. But it's an arguable point, not one that
goes either way.
Hey,
thanks for the announcement and all the work the election committee
has done so far.
I have written a kind of lengthy blog post about the elections and
about how and why the communities can or should get involved. It's in
German, but if anyone's interested in translating it, you are more
Hi,
The report covering Wikimedia engineering activities in April 2013 is now
available.
Wiki version:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_engineering_report/2013/April
Blog version:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/02/wikimedia-engineering-april-2013-report/
We're also proposing a
Odd that we're making this suggestion, when in fact conditional eligibility
already exists. Wikimedia Philippines, for example, is conditionally eligible
for FDC funding contingent on the completion of our deliverables (a grant
report), which I believe was already delivered.
Regards,
Josh
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Fae fae...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm hoping that the WMF can set a lead by publishing a calculation of
admin ratio for themselves. ;-)
PS staff salaries are not all automatically 'admin', I hope we can
agree that some
program activities are entirely justifiably
Hi Everyone,
As mentioned after Sue's announcement of her intention to depart the Foundation
we will try to ensure transparency in the work of the Transition Team where
possible (and respect privacy where necessary). To that end I would like to
draw you attention to a set of recent changes
Images from the meeting available here:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Vgrigas#Wikimedia_Foundation_Monthly_Metrics_Meeting_April_4.2C_2013
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Praveena Maharaj pmaha...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
REMINDER: This meeting starts in 30 minutes.
On Thu, Apr 25,
Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Maarten Dammers, 28/04/2013 11:58:
Last year after the Berlin Hackathon I sent an email to internal-l about
the accommodation. The text I sent was quite sharp to get a response. A
lot of people replied to the email and it contained a lot of useful
opinions. The
Thank you James for following up.
Now Japanese version available. Sorry for it's so late -- but hopes
it's better than nothing.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Blog/Drafts/Try_out_the_alpha_version_of_the_VisualEditor,_now_in_15_languages/ja
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 2:23 AM, James
24 matches
Mail list logo
