imo WMF is a mid-to-large sized IT company operating on a non-pofit basis.
Whoever has _both_ the skillset (and history) of reviewing IT companies and
charities, both types above 100+ employees can be considered capable of
reviewing WMF as a whole.
Cheers,
Balazs
2014.04.25. 21:17, Michael Peel
Hei,
As a supporter of language diversity, I’m a bit sad of this thread because
some people find we should not engage in language revitalisation because:
1/ it’s not explicitely in our scope (and I don’t fully aggree: sum of
all knowledge also includes minority cultures expressed in their
Seb, I agree with you 100%.
We need to advertise more clearly how the current projects, without
modification of scope and purpose, can be useful tools and platforms
for linguists and preservationists to extend and share their work.
In the US, we have had good relations with the Long Now
