Thank you, chapters and thorgs! I take your decision as a vote of
confidence that encourages me to work harder and better.
Congratulations, Frieda! I'm really happy to share with you this
responsability and I'm looking forward to work with you in the Board.
I also need to thank Alice for her
On 6/2/14, 10:55 PM, ??? wrote:
There is no public interest in how many time celeb X got a detention
at school for not doing their homework at junior high.
Isn't that the kind of information you would in fact expect to find in a
biography of any kind of public figure? If I were reading a
On 3 June 2014 03:02, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Because VE has repeatedly been mentioned in this list as something that is
improving and may help us with acquisition of editors and their knowledge,
I have started to draft an RfC about re-enabling VE on English Wikipedia.
I am
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Would WMF, being in the US, need to worry about this to any greater degree
than it worries about, say, Chinese publishing restrictions, or UK
superinjunctions?
First, WMF operates globally, and while I took pains as general
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Chris Keating
chriskeatingw...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't believe Wikipedia could be a data controller as it has no legal
personality, and legal personality is quite difficult to acquire when
you
set out to avoid acquiring it.
On this point I must disagree.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Would WMF, being in the US, need to worry about this to any greater
degree
than it worries about, say, Chinese publishing restrictions, or UK
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the ECJ need to establish jurisdiction over Wikimedia or specific users
(presumably only those users directly involved in creating or curating the
content in dispute)? We've seen in some situations in the past (e.g. with
On 3 June 2014 09:05, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 03:02, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Because VE has repeatedly been mentioned in this list as something that
is improving and may help us with acquisition of editors and their
knowledge, I have started to
Thanks to the organizers and facilitators for setting up the process.
And congratulations to Frieda and Patricio. I wish both of you every
success, strength and support for your work on the Board!
Alice.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Frieda Brioschi ubifri...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, I'm
Sounds like your suggestion would be a perfect contribution to some kind of
community discussion to try and decide a framework to decide if or when we
might want to re-deploy visual editor, much like Pine was suggesting in the
first place :-)
*Edward Saperia*
Chief Coordinator Wikimania London
On 3 June 2014 12:25, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 16:37, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, further to what I've said aboveI think that before having an
RFC,
we should seek community assistance to carry out a small-scale study so
that there is some
Thanks Ed. The point I am trying to make is that the community can't make
a good decision on this unless they understand the VisualEditor product as
it exists today. I think pretty much everyone agrees it wasn't ready for
default editing on 1 July 2013, but absent recent data most people would
On 3 June 2014 08:02, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have started to draft an RfC about re-enabling VE on English Wikipedia
URL?
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Hey Risker, Pine, David, all,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 12:25, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 16:37, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, further to what I've said aboveI think that before having an
On 2 June 2014 14:38, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
£2600, our current estimate, seems good value. Some bloke is charging me
£120 to come and tell me my dishwasher is broken
These things are hard to calculate. You could however get a Canon EF 180mm
f/3.5L Macro and a
On 03/06/2014 12:53, Mark wrote:
On 6/2/14, 10:55 PM, ??? wrote:
There is no public interest in how many time celeb X got a detention
at school for not doing their homework at junior high.
Isn't that the kind of information you would in fact expect to find in a
biography of any kind of public
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:23 PM, ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 03/06/2014 12:53, Mark wrote:
On 6/2/14, 10:55 PM, ??? wrote:
There is no public interest in how many time celeb X got a detention
at school for not doing their homework at junior high.
Isn't that the kind of
Minutes and slides from last week's quarterly review of the
Foundation's Mobile Contributions team are now available at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews/Mobile_contributions/May_2014
.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Erik Moeller
On 03/06/2014 22:35, Nathan wrote:
Interesting. Can you link me to a biography where a school detention is the
main feature of the article?
How about this 8 yo?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Emmanuel_of_Belgium#Biography
What about these other kids?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 03/06/2014 22:35, Nathan wrote:
Interesting. Can you link me to a biography where a school detention is
the
main feature of the article?
How about this 8 yo?
On 04/06/2014 00:06, Nathan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, ??? wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 03/06/2014 22:35, Nathan wrote:
Interesting. Can you link me to a biography where a school detention is
the
main feature of the article?
How about this 8 yo?
Greetings, all:
Here's a reminder that the FDC staff will be doing an IRC office hours in
12 minutes time (and counting!) about the FDC nominations on the
#wikimedia-office channel. [1] We'll hold another office hours later today
(though it might be tomorrow, depending on your timezone) at 16:00
On 02/06/14 20:14, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 2 June 2014 19:39, Ed Erhart the.e...@gmail.com wrote:
There is one person in charge of making the final calls of every issue—me.
This is troubling, Wikipedia is supposed to be an open,
community-driven initiative.
We've seen problems in the past
23 matches
Mail list logo
