Link does not work.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Nicole Askin
Sent: 16 July 2014 04:00 AM
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] AFD survey
We are looking
the http:// part has been left out.
Correct link is
http://fluidsurveys.com/s/WikipediaSurvey/
Regards
Sir48/Thyge
2014-07-16 8:29 GMT+02:00 Peter Southwood peter.southw...@telkomsa.net:
Link does not work.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From:
Dear UWO Wikipedia Research Team,
Your survey does not appear to have been approved by the Wikimedia
Research Committee (RCom). You can find contact details at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_Committee.
Due to concerns with regard to privacy, such as recording their IP
address against
Thanks. All questions were generic and about Wikipedia, so I answered
with the Italian Wikipedia in mind. Also note that it.wiki is perhaps
the only wiki which switched deletions from voting to non-voting: the
experiment was already done, you only need to measure and interpret it.
:-) See
In Polish Wikipedia there is no voting for deletion for around 3-4
years. There is discussion and then final decission is made by one of
admins who regularly maintains the deletion process.
2014-07-16 10:20 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com:
Thanks. All questions were generic and
If the people who have created this survey can fix the problems raised by
Fae, I'd be happy to share this with several language Wikipedians in India.
I'm sure that at this point nobody would want to be part of it.
On Jul 16, 2014 1:54 PM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
In Polish
Wall Street Journal (online) [1] had two days ago a long article on
Lsjbot, yesterday being their fourth most read article.
it was followed up yesterday by articles in media in Brazil, Poland,
(arabian paper), France, Australia Huffington Post etc
It will now in a few hours time be an
English hasn't used voting for a long time either. AfD discussions are
closed based on strength of argument and compliance with policy.
On Jul 16, 2014 2:24 AM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
In Polish Wikipedia there is no voting for deletion for around 3-4
years. There is discussion
Anders,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Anders Wennersten
m...@anderswennersten.se wrote:
Whilst you are doing some good things with these bot-created articles,
I do have some concerns.
Mainly, the fact that there is no human intervention in the creation process.
I have found myself having to
I would suggest that it doesn't become not a vote merely by not
calling it a vote. I note all the closes that count !votes and how
the not-voting pattern on a given AFD is frequently brought up at DRV.
On 16 July 2014 12:25, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
English hasn't used voting for a
Hello,
I feel that this is an unethical research project and I have told the
researcher so. We exchanged several emails and were unable to understand
each other. I asked them to please have their university ethics board
contact me.
I asked the researcher about RCOM and other things. This person
David Gerard, 16/07/2014 13:34:
I would suggest that it doesn't become not a vote merely by not
calling it a vote. I note all the closes that count !votes and how
the not-voting pattern on a given AFD is frequently brought up at DRV.
Sure, but calling it a vote makes it a vote. If it's
On 16 July 2014 12:39, Lane Rasberry l...@bluerasberry.com wrote:
...
I asked this researcher to discontinue the survey pending a check on the
impact of it on the Wikipedia community. I said this because I feel they
are out of compliance with even the soft suggestions in research that are
Good points, Lane. Such things were possibly discussed before, but it's the
first time that I see it it spelled out like this.
This approach should be advertised a bit somehow, so that the researchers
know how to do it ethically and for everybody's benefit, and so that the
experienced Wikipedians
On 07/16/2014 07:44 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
AFAIK deletion has
never been a vote by policy on en.wiki.
No, but it almost always devolves to a vote de facto. Interestingly
enough, that particular question (did you close discussions by counting
show of hand vs evaluating the rationales)
I agree.
It may be a good solution to patch the losing of editors... if there is
no plan for community support.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anders,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Anders Wennersten
m...@anderswennersten.se wrote:
Whilst
I am finally able to share with you the biggest benefit of WMRS
Microgrants projects for this year. It's about cooperation with one
very old institution, and it was necessary to wait for their formal
letter.
But first about the side effects of the Microgrants project...
When you are going
Great work!
On 16 July 2014 16:31, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
I am finally able to share with you the biggest benefit of WMRS
Microgrants projects for this year. It's about cooperation with one
very old institution, and it was necessary to wait for their formal
letter.
But
Perhaps Lane's involvement with RCOM would prevent submissions from going
unanswered for months - this is a huge roadblock to researchers who are
trying to do things ethically. On the other hand, if Lane were to accuse
other researchers of harming the community for personal gain, as he has
done
On 16 July 2014 12:34, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I would suggest that it doesn't become not a vote merely by not
calling it a vote. I note all the closes that count !votes and how
the not-voting pattern on a given AFD is frequently brought up at DRV.
Vote-counting is increasingly
Hoi,
WOW
Gerard
On 16 July 2014 17:31, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
I am finally able to share with you the biggest benefit of WMRS
Microgrants projects for this year. It's about cooperation with one
very old institution, and it was necessary to wait for their formal
letter.
But
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Lane Rasberry l...@bluerasberry.com
wrote:
Hello,
I feel that this is an unethical research project and I have told the
researcher so. We exchanged several emails and were unable to understand
each other. I asked them to please have their university ethics
Looks really nice. Could you send an update, when the files are uploaded?
And a blog post would be wonderful :)
Best!
C.
Cornelius Kibelka
Twitter: @jaancornelius
Mobile:+351-91-9860232 (Vodafone PT)
German number currently offline
On 16 July 2014 18:02, Gerard Meijssen
To avoid confusion with researchers in the future, I've made some minor
changes to the research related pages on Meta (see below). This should help
ensure that outdated documentation does not cause unnecessarily delay
and/or expense for those interested in doing Wikimedia-related research.
1:
Hi,
WMFr is still thinking about organizing Wikimedia Hackathon in 2015. We are
currently identifying the technical, financial and especially human resources
needed to make it a success.
Frans, could you provide me/us your documentation or the link (Meta ?) ? It
would be very useful.
Hi - copying this under a new subject that makes the topic more clear to
anyone skimming their inbox. Beyond the edits made below to clarify the
current practice, I was curious about the success and value of the RCOM in
general. First, I'm not aware of how active the committee was in the past
in
Congratulations to all involved, this is quite an auspicious start to a
project with a really remarkable amount of promise.
Best,
Kevin Gorman
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Cornelius Kibelka jckibe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looks really nice. Could you send an update, when the files are
And... unsurprisingly, Aaron has reverted the changes I referred to above.
Not with any explanation, of course, other than not true. Looking at the
list of reviewed projects (where the review appears to constitute a small
handful of questions on the talkpage), the RCOM has reviewed a total of 10
The mother bless us ,
my all Dearer ,
as you know , all is well , but everyone can not feel as all , so please change
your feeling and expresion .
Thanks ,
+91-9307788333
wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send Wikimedia-l mailing list submissions to
29 matches
Mail list logo
