Hoi,
Amir has created functionality that compares data from en.wp de.wp and
it.wp. It is data about humans and it only shows differences where they
exist. It compares those four Wikipedias with information in Wikidata.
The idea is that the report will be updated regularly.
The problem we face
Il 19/ago/2014 09:38 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Hoi,
Amir has created functionality that compares data from en.wp de.wp and
it.wp. It is data about humans and it only shows differences where they
exist. It compares those four Wikipedias with information in Wikidata.
Hoi,
My bad; four sources, three wikipedia ... I do not think in terms of
Wikipedias I am afraid.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 19 August 2014 09:58, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 19/ago/2014 09:38 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Hoi,
Amir has
Hi Amir,
2014-08-19 10:38 GMT+02:00 Amir Ladsgroup ladsgr...@gmail.com:
It's three now but the way I designed, it's very easy to extend.
Thanks for this report. I am amazed that over the hundreds of
thousands of Wikipedia biographies[*] it seems that we have only 38
inconsistencies.
Am I
Can we join more Wikipedias to the comparison?
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2014-08-19 10:38 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
Amir has created
Pretty sure those are just the :first: 38... Note the q numbers. (They are
ascending and don't make to q5000.)
That suggests the full list will be very large indeed.
Joe
www.joedecker.net
On Aug 19, 2014, at 2:49, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Amir,
2014-08-19
HoI,
You are absolutely right.. What is needed is a report that looks good
enough for now and a public ie visible place to put it.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 19 August 2014 12:13, Joe Decker joedec...@gmail.com wrote:
Pretty sure those are just the :first: 38... Note the q numbers. (They
are
Hi Pine, I'd love to contribute. I'll mail you offlist about that, but
I have a few general questions that others may be wondering about.
Would this be similar to one of these newsletters?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Newsletters#List_of_newsletters
If so, from your list of topics it sounds
IMHO a simple table, maybe even a wikitable, would suffice for the initial
iteration. We can get much more fancy later.
Of course, if Infoboxes/Persondata on these Wikipedias were to use some Lua
magic, biographies with e.g. mismatching birthdates could automatically be
added to a maintenance
Hi,
2014-08-19 12:13 GMT+02:00 Joe Decker joedec...@gmail.com:
Pretty sure those are just the :first: 38... Note the q numbers. (They
are ascending and don't make to q5000.)
That suggests the full list will be very large indeed.
This makes a lot of sense. Thanks.
Il 19/ago/2014 12:19 Gerard
Sorry to digress into minutiae, but as a note. The maintenance category idea
may have a subtle flaw, I suspect wikidata data updates won't update said
maintenance category until the corresponding Wikipedia page is
purged/rerendered.
--Joe
www.joedecker.net
On Aug 19, 2014, at 3:41, Magnus
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
What is needed is a report that looks good enough for now and a public ie
visible place to put it.
Neat idea!
There's https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Database_reports, of
course. In my experience, users don't really care what the report is
titled or how it looks;
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Of course, if Infoboxes/Persondata on these Wikipedias were to use some Lua
magic, biographies with e.g. mismatching birthdates could automatically be
added to a maintenance category...
We already do that for
Hi folks,
This is a response to Martin's note here:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-August/073936.html
.. and also a more general update on the next steps regarding disputes
about deployments. As you may have seen, Lila has also posted an
update to her talk page, here:
Thank you, Erik, for your clarifications and understanding. Personally, I
hope that most anger will calm down now although not everyone will agree
with everything that was said or done (e.g. ignoring RfCs under some
conditions, using superprotect instead of counting on local procedures to
stop
I think those are wonderful steps and I really hope that the German
wikipedians are ready for dialogue.
Given the big number of people that might want to answer Lila's questions,
shouldn't they be asked in a more public page, or organized in a more
international/multilingual way, for a delimited
On 19 August 2014 20:12, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thank your for your lengthy and considered post. It's clear that you
and the WMF are seeking an amicable resolution, which is to be
applauded.
Nonetheless, I'm having difficulty understanding how these two statements:
the
Hi Wil,
Yes, this newsletter will be similar to those on the page you linked.
The relevance of an article about check fraud is that Wikimedia thematic
organizations should be aware of financial security issues that could
impact them, and check fraud is one of those issues.
Yes, a how-to article
Erik Moeller wrote:
I am -- genuinely -- sorry that this escalation occurred. We would
have preferred to avoid it.
I think making amends requires cleaning up the mess you've made on the
German Wikipedia and throughout the Wikimedia ecosystem. I don't think
many German Wikipedians or other
Hi all,
There are online small business accounting software packages. Do any
thematic orgs have experience with them? Any recommendations? I am thinking
about proposing Quickbooks Online for the Cascadia user group, but as this
Forbes article says, there are competitors:
20 matches
Mail list logo
