Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames

Proper data-based stubs are being worked on: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/1416/ Lsjbot, you have no chance to survive make your time. Il 06/09/2015 02:40, Anders Wennersten ha scritto: Geonames [1] is a database which holds around 9 M entries of geographical related items

[Wikimedia-l] Move on to another subject.... (was: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising)

I think it is time to move on to another subject so lets consider this one closed. Regards, Richard (one of your moderators) ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines

Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames

Congratulations for the stub creation, they are good (and better that those handmade stubs in other languages). About the Wikidata placeholder project, it sounds very interesting. 2015-09-06 2:40 GMT+02:00 Anders Wennersten : > Geonames [1] is a database which holds

Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames

Hoi, PLEASE reconsider. A Wikidata based solution is not superior because it started from Wikidata. PLEASE consider collaboration. It will be so much more powerful when LSJBOT and people at Wikidata collaborate. It will get things right the first time. It does not have to be perfect from the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [[wikimedia-I] Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising

Craig has a good point, but this is a lovely example of two projects planning on very different timescales. The most important countries for a future Wiki Loves Monuments campaign are some of the very countries that fundraising could have had this September, the ones where there has not yet

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising

Lila, As you have appended your message to this thread, I assume that there is a non-zero probability that you are referring to one or more of the contributors to the thread. I do not consider any of the mails included to be polarizing rhetoric, so could you inform us whether you do, and if

Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames

Hoi, As always I have been a big fan of the wonderful work that has been done. My reaction was very much for what I perceived as a negative reaction from Ricordisamoa. Telling you to stop and become part of Wikidata is a bit off. Asking for collaboration and work towards a common goal, a goal that

Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames

Hoi, "Article Placeholders are automatically generated content pages in Wikipedia or other mediawiki projects displaying data from Wikidata." Seriously? RobotWiki? Do we really want this? Quality, not quantity. > From: gerard.meijs...@gmail.com > Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:35:31 +0200 > To:

Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames

At svwp we work closely with Wikidata and see it as the natural base for our article substance. And we follow closely Phabricator and are eager to implement it as soon as it will be feasible to implement. And Lsjbot is in no way counteractive to these. It will be easy to exchange Lsjbot

Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames

Hoi, Wouldn't have it been a better use of Sverker's brainpower to implement a long-term solution that doesn't require saving articles to the wiki? Il 06/09/2015 11:23, Anders Wennersten ha scritto: At svwp we work closely with Wikidata and see it as the natural base for our article

Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames

2015-09-06 13:22 GMT+02:00 Steinsplitter Wiki : > Hoi, > > "Article Placeholders are automatically generated content pages in > Wikipedia or other mediawiki projects displaying data from Wikidata." > Seriously? RobotWiki? Do we really want this? Quality, not

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wiki Loves Monuments] Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy largely blocked by WMF fundraising

I think everyone here worked in good faith, and everyone started with patience in this situation. Suggesting otherwise suggests a lack of empathy. But we should not close our eyes when the community is being played in a non fair way, and I then mean NOT the bocking banner, but how the interaction