Proper data-based stubs are being worked on:
Lsjbot, you have no chance to survive make your time.
Il 06/09/2015 02:40, Anders Wennersten ha scritto:
Geonames  is a database which holds around 9 M entries of
geographical related items
I think it is time to move on to another subject so lets consider this
Regards, Richard (one of your moderators)
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Congratulations for the stub creation, they are good (and better that those
handmade stubs in other languages).
About the Wikidata placeholder project, it sounds very interesting.
2015-09-06 2:40 GMT+02:00 Anders Wennersten :
> Geonames  is a database which holds
PLEASE reconsider. A Wikidata based solution is not superior because it
started from Wikidata.
PLEASE consider collaboration. It will be so much more powerful when LSJBOT
and people at Wikidata collaborate. It will get things right the first
time. It does not have to be perfect from the
Craig has a good point, but this is a lovely example of two projects planning
on very different timescales. The most important countries for a future Wiki
Loves Monuments campaign are some of the very countries that fundraising could
have had this September, the ones where there has not yet
Lila, As you have appended your message to this thread, I assume that there is
a non-zero probability that you are referring to one or more of the
contributors to the thread. I do not consider any of the mails included to be
polarizing rhetoric, so could you inform us whether you do, and if
As always I have been a big fan of the wonderful work that has been done.
My reaction was very much for what I perceived as a negative reaction from
Ricordisamoa. Telling you to stop and become part of Wikidata is a bit off.
Asking for collaboration and work towards a common goal, a goal that
"Article Placeholders are automatically generated content pages in
Wikipedia or other mediawiki projects displaying data from Wikidata."
Seriously? RobotWiki? Do we really want this? Quality, not quantity.
> From: gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:35:31 +0200
At svwp we work closely with Wikidata and see it as the natural base for
our article substance. And we follow closely Phabricator and are eager
to implement it as soon as it will be feasible to implement. And Lsjbot
is in no way counteractive to these. It will be easy to exchange Lsjbot
Wouldn't have it been a better use of Sverker's brainpower to implement
a long-term solution that doesn't require saving articles to the wiki?
Il 06/09/2015 11:23, Anders Wennersten ha scritto:
At svwp we work closely with Wikidata and see it as the natural base
for our article
2015-09-06 13:22 GMT+02:00 Steinsplitter Wiki :
> "Article Placeholders are automatically generated content pages in
> Wikipedia or other mediawiki projects displaying data from Wikidata."
> Seriously? RobotWiki? Do we really want this? Quality, not
I think everyone here worked in good faith, and everyone started with
patience in this situation. Suggesting otherwise suggests a lack of empathy.
But we should not close our eyes when the community is being played in a
non fair way, and I then mean NOT the bocking banner, but how the
Mail list logo