Does the Affiliations Committee have a list of existing chapters which do
not meet the proposed criteria? I think we should at least get a sense for
that, and those chapters should be notified and be put on the path to
meeting standards or losing their status.
What's the harm in letting chapters
I agree with Ben.
It is worthwhile understand why existing chapters may not meet these
criteria, especially if it is viable/active chapters that fail the
criteria, rather than the few dormant chapters who also fail simpler
criteria.
I suspect these criteria, which are a good baseline, can be
Hello! I can't believe I missed this email thread. Thanks all for the
welcomes! I will definitely be reaching out to some of you directly, but if
I might ask – can we ask advice *on* this list? I understand it's a fairly
high-traffic list, so other than wasting this list's time with mundane
Hi Kevin,
Welcome!
This is a high traffic list with a wide variety of topics. You might also
be interested in the Affiliates mailing list, and in WikimediaUS-l.
Also, please do attend the US Wikimedians meeting next week if possible.
Info at
