We have seen various appointments to influential committees within the WMF
"system" in recent weeks: the Funds Dissemination Committee and the Board
Governance Committee Volunteer and Advisory members; the Board Election
Committee is being geared up and new Board members will soon be selected by
You clearly have a strong and abiding interest in movement governance, and
have been asking some good questions. You should have submitted your
candidacy.[1]
To your point, I guess it can be taken as a reminder, but it does not seem
to me that the appointments were made *so as to minimize*
I have mixed feelings about this.
On the one hand, I agree that we need to work on developing new leaders.
That includes:
* On-wiki administrators
* On-wiki program leaders
* Affiliate board and committee members (including user groups, which IMO
get far too little support from WMF)
* Affiliate