Dear all,
As part of the roadmap AffCom agreed with us after they decided to suspend
some of our benefits within the Wikimedia Foundation programs
(https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/private/wikimediapt/2018-July/002625.html
I apologize for the unusually large load of typos, especially misspelling
Kaarel's name. Usually I get enough sleep but last night I didn't.
Apparently my attention to detail is diminished.
I'm rapidly spending my Wikimedia-l quota of 15 emails per calendar month,
so if there is extensive
http://mic.tatarstan.ru/rus/index.htm/news/1273420.htm
It's probably the first time regional government website in the Russian
Federation quoted Russian Wikinews article
https://ru.wikinews.org/wiki/Главные_сайты_Татарстана_перешли_на_свободную_лицензию
― only the part about Republic of
Hello Gonçalo,
Thank you for this report.
I would like to ask the Affiliations Committee to post the July 2018
resolution regarding Wikimedia Portugal to this mailing list and to publish
that resolution on Meta.
I am an advocate for transparency about financial and governance matters,
which
*The Guardian* published an encouraging opinion piece about Wikipedia:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/02/in-hysterical-world-wikipedia-ray-of-light-truth
In *This Month in Education*, there were some nice reports. I especially
appreciated this report from The Hashemite
I echo the request Affcom publish this decision and others in a more
transparent and expedient manner. Ideally that would include a brief
justification for the decisions as well, the movement should be informed
about the dealings of the Affiliations Committee.
Chico Venancio
2018-09-03 16:40
Hello colleagues,
A topic which I feel that I should address again on this mailing list is
revenue for Wikimedia work, specifically WMF and non-WMF sources of revenue.
I will start by talking about my personal situation, and then discuss some
related situations.
I am currently requesting a
I second, and strongly support Pine's suggestion.
Being the Affiliations Committee a community-run Wikimedia committee
emanating from the Wikimedia Movement itself, transparency is to be
expected whenever it is possible. As far as I know, there is nothing
confidential in that resolution.