Hi Ziko,
I believe the only "official" rationale is in the 2012 Board resolution:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Resolutions/Recognizing_Models_of_Affiliations
and the thinking behind this is documented here, also from 2011-12.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project
I do
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 at 05:50, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> The disappointing you show and the grotesque conclusions are imho based
> in a sense of entitlement.
I don't think calling Yuri's conclusions grotesque or saying he is entitled
are particularly productive comments. Let's keep this list
Sorry, people, but I would like to read an official statement of the WMF
(committee) what is the reason or rationale behind this policy to accept WM
user groups in countries where you already have a chapter. Does anybody
have a link?
Kind regards
Ziko
Am Sa., 5. Okt. 2019 um 19:16 Uhr schrieb
Plans for a Wikimedia LGBT+ conference and workshops in 2020 are
moving forward. We would very much like to learn and borrow successful
experiences from other conferences. This conference is expected to be
relatively modest in size, around 50 attendees, and is to be hosted in
Linz, Austria.
We
Gerard, you assume that "my wikipedia" is the only project I participate
in? Let me assure you this is not the case. On the contrary, the last few
years I mostly contributed to Wikidata and recently - a massive Wiktionary
lexeme import, and very little to Wikipedia.
That said, I think removing
Hello,
I have wished that eventually when people apply for scholarships or even
when they attend wiki events they create profiles for themselves in
Wikidata so that we could generate visualizations of the demographics of
participants.
I do not think the wiki movement is quite ready for this, but
Besides any other aspects, most scholarship recipients are probably not
notable. When I suggested to create items for all of the Wikimania sessions
I perceived it as concensus (in the Wikidata telegram group) that they were
not notable. So unless they already are notable (and already should have
Making their data publicly available? Yiiikes!
Vito
Il giorno lun 7 ott 2019 alle ore 22:39 Lane Rasberry
ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> I have wished that eventually when people apply for scholarships or even
> when they attend wiki events they create profiles for themselves in
> Wikidata so
Hi Ziko,
When WMPT was forced by AffCom early this year to change the old chapter
agreement we had signed in 2009 for a new one, which we were told was the
current model for everyone, the main difference between the two was
precisely the end of the chapter hegemony over the national territory. We
I'm pretty shocked at this idea; in fact, if someone created a Wikidata
profile about me, I'd have it taken down under applicable legislation.
Making financial support contingent on adding one's name to a publicly
editable database does not seem to be particularly wise, nor for that
matter
Hoi,
For any and all other conventions those giving a presentation are notable
per the completeness of informing and linking to the presentations. Quite
often people have presented before and only when these presentations are
linked through their presenter it is possible to make the connection.
Dear all,
Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong has released the following
statement in response to the effect to the local community from the use of
Emergency Regulations Ordinance within the city:
***
Free speech, expression and access to uncensored web services are some of
the fundamental
Hoi,
You are entitled to an opinion and you may voice it and so am I. The
Wikimedia Foundation is not a democracy and neither is our movement. This
was done with deliberation. At best our movement is represented in the
board and through its chapters. In essence the main function of the WMF is
to
13 matches
Mail list logo
