Re: [Wikimedia-l] Snøhetta and Wikimedia

2020-01-19 Thread geni
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 00:50, Pine W wrote: > > There are ways that Wikimedia rebranding consultations could be done > collaboratively, politely, and with careful stewardship of donor's money. > This is not one of them. Eh questionable. The community is difficult to engage at the best of times

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Snøhetta and Wikimedia

2020-01-19 Thread Mike Peel
This meta RfC might be of interest: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Should_the_Foundation_call_itself_Wikipedia Gracias, Mike > On 19 Jan 2020, at 08:54:12, geni wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 at 00:50, Pine W wrote: >> >> There are ways that Wikimedia rebranding

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Face recognition

2020-01-19 Thread Ryan Merkley
I don't believe it implies that. As with many things legal, the answer re: derivatives is likely "it depends". R. On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 10:30 PM Benjamin Ikuta wrote: > > > Thanks for that. > > Pardon me if I've missed something, but that seems to imply, but not > directly state, that AI

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Face recognition

2020-01-19 Thread John Erling Blad
From my background in neural networks, and my understanding of how they work, I would say that your trained network is a derived work if the weights are learned from a specific training sample. If it does not learn from a specific sample it is not a derived work from that sample. It is not

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Face recognition

2020-01-19 Thread Newyorkbrad
This whole subject raises interesting and important legal and ethical issues, but are there any direct implications at this time for Wikipedia/Wikimedia projects? Newyorkbrad/IBM On Sunday, January 19, 2020, Ryan Merkley wrote: > I don't believe it implies that. As with many things legal,

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Face recognition

2020-01-19 Thread John Erling Blad
Training sets already contain images from Commons, so yes, I believe the implications should be considered. On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:46 PM Newyorkbrad wrote: > > This whole subject raises interesting and important legal and ethical > issues, but are there any direct implications at this time