Hi everyone. I have seen some of the reactions to the narratives generated by
Chat GPT. There is an obvious question (to me at least) as to whether a
Wikipedia chat bot would be a legitimate UI for some users. To that end, I
would have hoped that it would have been developed by the WMF but the
Thank you Ziko and Steven for the thoughtful responses.
My sense is that for a class for readers having a generative UI that returns an
answer VS an article would be useful. It would probably put Quora out of
business. :-)
If the models are not open source, this indeed would require developing
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 4:09 PM Victoria Coleman <
vstavridoucole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone. I have seen some of the reactions to the narratives generated
> by Chat GPT. There is an obvious question (to me at least) as to whether a
> Wikipedia chat bot would be a legitimate UI for some
As a friend wrote on a Slack thread about the topic, "ChatGPT can produce
results that appear stunningly intelligent, and there are things that I’ve seen
that really leave me scratching my head- “how on Earth did it DO that?!?”
But it’s important to remember that it isn’t actually intelligent.
Hello Victorioa,
Thank you for the great question!
In my humble opinion, ChatGPT is far away from producing useful
Wikipedia content. My own experience is here to see:
https://youtu.be/zKPEyxYt5kg
But anyone who wants to use the existing AI website(s) may use the AI
at pleasure and copy content
I think the simplest answer is yes its an artificial writer but its not
intelligence as the name implies but rather just a piece of software that
gives answers according to the methodology of that software. The garbage in
garbage out format, it can never be better than the programmers behind the
Hi,
just to remark that it superficially looks like a great tool for small
language Wikipedias (for which the translation tool is typically not
available). One can train the tool in some less common language using the
dictionary and some texts, and then let it fill the project with a
thousands of
