Has anyone translated the email into English? Would be interesting to see
what it says...
On 7 February 2014 21:33, Leinonen Teemu teemu.leino...@aalto.fi wrote:
I just got a message that the Finnish Police have asked the fi.wikipedia,
by sending an email to the wikifi-ad
Apparently they got no response:
On 10 February 2014 15:41, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, he would definitely have enjoyed this one
2014-02-10 9:51 GMT+01:00, Leinonen Teemu
*Philippe Beaudette * \\ Director, Community Advocacy \\ Wikimedia
T: 1-415-839-6885 x6643 | phili...@wikimedia.org | :
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Alex Monk kren...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 June 2014 23:29, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Please help us improve this app by sending a note to our mailing list,
Not mobile-l ? Is the above a private list?
All lists are @lists.wikimedia.org. This address points to an OTRS queue
This is very weird. Remember that we are a (multi-lingual, cough cough)
community with a Foundation - not the other way around. There's no need for
this kind of weird organisation of volunteering related to Wikimedia.
What was the purpose of this page?
Alex Monk (in my capacity as a volunteer
Not for me...
On 9 August 2014 15:27, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2014, at 23:11, James Forrester wrote:
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
On 16 January 2016 at 10:08, Yury Bulka
> MZMcBride writes:
> > A few years ago, the Wikimedia Foundation switched over to the Google
> > platform, which means that most e-mail sent on the wikimedia.org domain
> > now
On 23 February 2016 at 12:17, Andrew Lih wrote:
> > The main disadvantage is the lack of good archiving - it is pretty hard
> > find something on fb after say - half a year.
> Compare that to IRC which disallows logging altogether. It’s not just hard
> to find
On 22 January 2016 at 22:00, John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
> fwiw, A few days ago Jimmy disclosed that "James voted in favor of Arnnon".
I'm not sure I'd call it a disclosure since it had already been made public
On 13 March 2016 at 20:07, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Volunteers (ie neither staff or contractors) might have to sign a NDA
> whenever they get privileged access. The process is on:
> What I suspect is granting public read
On 20 November 2016 at 13:35, Jonathan Cardy
> The nastiest trolling, personal attacks and certainly the rape and murder
> threats will get people blocked anywhere in the movement except maybe,
> definitely in the past but hopefully not today, on IRC.
I think they can see the subdomain too (i.e. en.wikipedia.org or
tr.wikipedia.org) but yeah.
On Thu, 24 May 2018, 09:13 James Hare, wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:55 AM, David Cuenca Tudela
> > Hi Eileen,
> > Thanks for the follow up
"*Non-Board members present:* [...], Jaime Villagomez (Treasurer; Chief
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, 20:46 James Salsman, wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> Thanks for posting the minutes. Regarding "Jaime presented a proposed
> revision to the Foundation investment policy that shifted to a
So we just need someone to populate that table with expiry dates?
On 1 July 2018 at 16:41, Steinsplitter Wiki
> Von: Wikimedia-l im Auftrag von
> Michael Snow
On 28 July 2018 at 03:19, Gregory Varnum wrote:
> Thank you to everyone that has provided thoughtful and constructive input
> on this discussion, and to the volunteers who are investigating the
> possible policy violations. We have some additional information on this
> vendor relationship and on
On 10 July 2018 at 12:06, Bodhisattwa Mandal
> 1) Not all communities have been informed about this future change (
The plan appears to be to do this, maybe it just hasn't happened yet:
Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe browsers always ignored HPKP rules
when presented with a cert signed by a CA that is locally installed rather
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019, 12:58 John Erling Blad, wrote:
> The Kazakhstan MITM could be stopped by HTTP Public Key Pinning , but
Sounds like you may have been affected by
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T238038 which would've sent you to a page
Why are you attempting to connect using old versions of TLS?
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 20:30, Benjamin Ikuta
> Was support
I've had a few successes in the past with getting Google to remove
vandalised versions of pages from their cache/main search results using
https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/removals?pli=1 - in this case it
appears in the knowledge panel but not the cached copy of the page, so it
Mail list logo