I understand it represents some money to fly ~10 people to SF (though I
guess in the end those meetings would match other global meetings such as
Wikimedia Conference or Wikimania) every six month, but on the other hand
the FDC is gonna be in charge of disseminating ~30million USD, some
It’s my pleasure to announce that James Forrester is joining our San
Francisco office as a Technical Product Analyst, supporting the Visual
Editor team. James started his work as a remote contractor yesterday
and will be joining us in San Francisco later this year as a staff
member.
One thing that came up in discussion was whether or not anyone has ever
done any economic impact studies on Wikipedia and other community-produced
open data and open content projects (OpenStreetMap, other Wikimedia
projects etc.)? If civic society groups like Wikimedians,
OpenStreetMappers,
What an odd resolution to post. But Just on this point
whereas because of their low levels of compensation, junior foundation
technical staff are often unable to afford housing which does not
involve a lengthy commute from unsavory neighborhoods;[11]
[11]
Since we don't thank each other enough in this movement.
I'd like to add my thanks, to Wikimedia Italia for the great job they did
organising their first Wikimedia conference, to everyone who spoke or
presented, to the facilitators (whose facilitation extended to trying to
find a bar with space
(off-topic)
And how come an English pub in Italia?! At least the grapa was good. ;)
As I mentioned to a few people at the time, the beer was mainly German,
Czech and Irish, and the spirits mainly Scottish, American, Italian and
Russian, and the food was mainly nachos.
Might not sound very
In the light of some of the discussion about overhead and fundraising cost
ratios on this list, I would like to congratulate the Arrythmia Alliance, a
UK registered charity, for two remarkable feats revealed in its annual
return to the Charity Commission:
Thank you Michael for the thoughtful post!
I very much agree. I read somewhere (don't ask me for a citation!) that the
physiological effects of anger - increased levels of adrenalin and
cortisol, high heart rate, and the like - take about 30 minutes to return
to normal after something happens
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Chris Keating
chriskeatingw...@gmail.comwrote:
Thank you Michael for the thoughtful post!
I very much agree. I read somewhere (don't ask me for a citation!) that
the physiological effects of anger - increased levels of adrenalin and
cortisol, high heart rate
Dear all,
Thought you might like to hear news from Wikimedia UK's AGM.
We held elections for four Trustees - we elect 3 one year and 4 the next,
for two-year terms.
Saad Choudhri and Greyham Dawes were elected for the first time, but are
not new to the Board, as they were both co-opted to fill
That sounds interesting!
What does a Chapter's Chief Scientific Officer do?
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Manuel Schneider
manuel.schnei...@wikimedia.ch wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:05:45 +0200
Von:Chantal Ebongué
I am extraordinarily confused to the point that I had to double check my
inbox that this is a Wikimedia-l thread.
I'd like someone to clarify if this thread has been approved by LaffCom?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Uniform portraits?
Maybe that's an idea - I am just imagining Brandon in firefighter uniform,
James Forrester in the uniform of a Beefeater guarding the Tower of London,
and the whole of Legal in Special Forces cammo led by Geoff carrying a
pearl-handled Colt and chomping on a cigar.
Make it so!
(Rumor has it that HR is soon going to introduce a new caring and
loving penguin into the habitat. Perhaps the HR penguin can mediate
should matters escalate quickly.)
Erik - to be frank I think this would be a serious mistake.
A penguin would have no understanding of the Wikimedia culture.
,
Chris Keating
Chair, Wikimedia UK
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
So, which other chapters are up for building out serious software
engineering capacity?
Actually we've been having this conversation a bit as part of our strategic
planning process - how much should Wikimedia UK be doing technology and
what place should it have in our long-term goals? After
Thank you for the update, Ziko.
I'd like to offer my thanks to you, Markus, Fae and everyone who devoted
time and effort to pushing the Chapters Association forward. The concept of
chapters sharing, reviewing and offering each other a helping hand remains
remains very important and I'm glad to
At Wikimania there was (not for the first time) discussion that not much
support and advice there is available to Chapter board members. On Sunday
afternoon a small group of us (myself, Markus Glaser, Michał Buczyński,
Claudia Garad) met to work out how we could actually provide some training
to
Thanks for all the enthusiasm!
Since you said it will be organised in the early 2014, does it mean that
the workshop will happen in Chapter Conference 2014?
Hi Ted,
It could happen as a pre-meeting to the Wikimedia Conference, or it could
be a stand-alone workshop earlier in the year. This
Indeed! Given that a while back people were asking whether this conference
would happen *at all* it is very good to see that there are four chapters
willing to host. Many thanks to Germany, Sweden, India and Italy. :-)
I am not sure whether anyone has called for a programme committee or
similar
For what it's worth, I've posted my own comments on Meta.
I'd echo Manuel's comment that it's important to have these discussions in
a professional and respectful way. As a movement we are still dealing with
the issue of how to make the most of the funds and the opportunities we
have. This will
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Srikanth Ramakrishnan
srik.r...@wikimedia.in wrote:
That would be a great idea; but nobody seems to bother. They just start
editing articles right away.
Oh no! People editing articles! What a disaster!
/sarcasm
Chris
Dear all,
I am pleased to announce that the programme is now available for the
Wikimedia Boards Training Workshop that will take place in London in March
2014.
This is a small event focused on giving Chapter/Thematic Org boards the
skills and confidence to do a great job. We are using a wide
Many thanks for the considerable hard work that has gone into this process
from the FDC and the staff assisting them.
Regards,
Chris
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.plwrote:
Hello friends,
The Funds Dissemination Committee meets twice annually to help
***Registration is now open for the Wikimedia Boards Training Workshop in
London, 1-2 March 2014.***
Are you a Board member of a Wikimedia Chapter or Thematic Organisation?
Then this workshop is for you! We are drawing on expertise from within the
Wikimedia movement and beyond to produce a
Correcting link:
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/board-training-workshop-tickets-8850487045
*cough*
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.comwrote:
***Registration is now open for the Wikimedia Boards Training Workshop in
London, 1-2 March 2014.***
Are you
Also, in response to a query: It is possible to register without paying
registration right away. If you click Other Payment Options you can
select one of those and we will settle up with you eventually. :-)
Chris
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.comwrote
or awaiting
recognition.
Regards,
On 5 Dec 2013 20:27, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, in response to a query: It is possible to register without paying
registration right away. If you click Other Payment
? Fiscal responsibility, best use of donor funds,
following WMF's best practices for grant funding... These are off the
table? What else is there?
Sincerely,
Laura Hale
On Friday, December 6, 2013, Chris Keating wrote:
Hi Laura, you can bypass the registration fee by selecting other payment
Vice President
*Wikimédia Magyarország Egyesület*
Tel: +36 70 633 6372
Mail: balazs.vicz...@wikimedia.hu
Web: www.wikimedia.hu Blog: Magyar Wikipédia Magazin
http://huwiki.blogspot.hu
Facebook: Magyar Wikipédia https://www.facebook.com/hu.wikipedia
2013/12/6 Chris Keating chriskeatingw
Dear all,
I just wanted to let you know that Michael Maggs has taken over from me as
Chair of Wikimedia UK. Michael has served as chair of the Governance
Committee since his election to the Board in June, is a long-serving
Wikimedia Commons bureaucrat, and I am sure he will do an excellent job.
Other forms of money we do not currently accept include gold coins, Yap
money, Tesco Clubcard Points, cowrie shells and cattle.
We could accept any of them in theory.
Though if anyone wants to donate a herd of cattle to Wikimedia UK please
could they contact the office in advance.
Chris
On 12
This is a truly awesome initiative, and many thanks to those involved in
organising it!
Chris
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Jake Orlowitz jorlow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey folks,
Just a reminder that Cochrane is taking signups for a Wikipedian in
Residence: Wikipedia:COCHRANE/WIR
Thanks Alice.
For those interested in this, you might like to note that James Hare has
started a discussion about the method used to select these Board members,
here; - it reflects the likelihood that thematic orgs will be part of the
decision not just chapters.
Should movement organisations in planning come to the Wikimedia
Conference?
This is a question that has been asked, does not yet appear to have a
definite answer, and indeed it is not clear who should answer it.
Please provide your thoughts here;
Chipping in my 2p very quickly -
Given it's a senior WMF staff member leaving to join another movement
organisation, it makes perfect sense that both bodies have put out a joint
statement.
It's also a good thing for the movement that it's possible to spin off
projects like this, which the
Just to be clear, there was no only 2 representatives plus an ED rule
mentioned in the registration process.
If there had been, then Wikimedia UK would have respected it.
Given that there wasn't, we thought it was useful to send more than 2
trustees, as we have many new Board members and it is
Great! We are starting to have the conversation we need to have!
So: What is the purpose of the Wikimedia Conference?
This has never been clearly defined, in my view.
I certainly found attending last year useful as it was a chance to get to
know face-to-face people I only knew over email, to
I am genuinely puzzled as to why, if nobody on the WMUK board (such as
the CEO or the current Chairman) is sure what the purpose of the
conference is, they should chose to invest the donor's money in
sending 5 trustees and 3 full time employees to it (presumably the
employees are being
facilitators in Berlin. I will ensure that, as far as possible,
everyone who wishes to ask a question or to contribute to the discussion
has the chance to do so.
If you have any questions about these sessions, please don't hesitate to
contact me.
Kind regards,
Chris Keating
(1)
https
As one of the organisers of the workshop, I feel I ought to chime in here.
If I remember correctly, those remarks were made as a passing comment in a
very emotional session about the role of movement organisations. I don't
believe anyone present took them to heart.
Indeed, the vast majority of
I'd certainly hope not. One of the ground rules for the workshop was that
individual contributions were made on a confidential and non-attributable
basis.
This was exactly because we wanted people to speak freely and not worry
about a witch-hunt on an email list if a couple of trolls got hold of
Just to clarify that I don't believe Tomasz, the original poster, was
trolling.
You, Ashley, have been doing so spectacularly :)
On 7 Apr 2014 16:50, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
No. You may want to look at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_on_Standards_in_Public_Life
this does not
(tomorrow) and organisations have until 31 May to cast votes.
Many thanks,
Chris Keating
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
However, I believe the questions were noted to be sent to some of the
candidates, perhaps a good way would be to republish them and ask them
to answer on meta ?
Good idea. I've done this for two questions aimed at all of the candidates.
Thanks,
Chris
This would be an interesting discussion to have in the next movement
strategy process.
I can see the attraction of doing this, but much better to think about it
alongside questions like what are our collective goals, how much money
do we want to have and the like.
Regards,
Chris
On 15 Apr 2014
I'd certainly take quite a broad view of which languages fulfill our
mission. Certainly I wouldn't be comfortable with arguments as simple as
All people who speak Y also read X, so there's no purpose putting
resources into Y.
Wikimedia UK does little work with Gaelic, but quite a bit with Welsh;
Hi all,
I've started a page on Meta which I hope will act as a hub for
documentation and ideas around the training and development needs of
Wikimedia movement organisations:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Organisational_development
I'd ask anyone who's interested in this kind of thing to have
Congratulations, Lila!
On 1 May 2014 20:49, Frans Grijzenhout fr...@wikimedia.nl wrote:
Welcome Lila, hope to meet you in person in London. And thanks to Jan-Bart
the other members of the transition team. I will forward this great news
to the Dutch board community.
Frans Grijzenhout
@Risker: I was thinking the same, hence my disagreement with Odder's
decision. But I've visited the linked website (NSFW) and one can only
assume that the person on the pictures is fully aware of the implication of
said photos on the internet and willing to see them diffused.
I don't think
Though in this case it does seem that Commons has given sound advice that
any photos submitted should be accompanied by a model release.
If only more photos on Commons had model releases!
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Chris Keating
chriskeatingw...@gmail.comwrote:
@Risker: I was thinking
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 8:51 AM, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
I will say, in Lila's defense, that I've been impressed with what I've
seen of her in public. (:
However, Wil, I agree with points others have made. I'm concerned that
you're going to create drama with what you're
Thanks AffComm - it is great to see this moving forward.
I have added this info to the Organisational Development page on Meta;
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Organisational_development
Chris
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Gregory Varnum gregory.var...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings,
Based
As I understand it, the right to be forgotten will only affect the
discoverability of content, rather than existence of content.
So if we rely on a source which says that person X did Y many years ago,
and X succeeds in invoking their right to be forgotten, then the source
will no longer appear
I don't believe Wikipedia could be a data controller as it has no legal
personality, and legal personality is quite difficult to acquire when you
set out to avoid acquiring it.
On this point I must disagree.
I'd be interested to hear why :-)
I think also though that if editors are
Whatever the right to be forgotten may turn out to be, it's not
about publication of previously unpublished information. Ergo, it's
not about invasion of privacy, broadly speaking. The opinion makes
clear that one can publish true, accurate, already-published
information and nevertheless be
I have jotted down a few notes on the recent process for the selection by
movement affiliates of Foundation board members. As you might recall, the
result of this year's process was announced last week.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Affiliate-selected_Board_seats
Please join in if you
I expect this would be an interesting meeting if people are interested in
participating, and I hope that we would brainstorm some ideas about how we
want to move forward on all of these questions and others if we have time.
Hi Pine,
I think it would be much more productive to think about
Hi Wenke,
Many thanks for this, it's very useful reading!
I wonder if there is any more detail about each of the individual sessions.
Not everyone attended each session so it would be interesting to see how
each session was evaluated by the people who were present (either
numerically or with
Hi all,
A handful of spaces are still left for the Wikimedia movement Boards
training workshop on 7 August.
This would be great for anyone on a Chapter or Thematic Organisation board
who wants to make best advantage of Wikimania to sharpen their governance
skills.
Further details
In that case how would the Foundation tell if someone made a number of
donations of under $1k that were declarable in aggregate?
Hi Lisa,
I admit I am not an expert in U.S. tax law, so I could be entirely
misinterpreting it. But my read of the IRS instructions are that donors who
donate more than
All we have to do now is answer some of those questions!
On 9 Aug 2014 15:22, Pierre-Selim pierre-se...@huard.info wrote:
Thank you so much to everyone involve in work. It's awesome!
2014-08-09 14:29 GMT+02:00 Nicole Ebber nicole.eb...@wikimedia.de:
Hi all,
we have just published the
It is clear to me that the Foundation has agreed on this sneaky change
behind closed doors while some of the most outspoken Wikimedia
volunteers were (and still are) gathered in London.
It's interesting you mention Wikimania, because one of the things I took
away from the conference was the
I think the most helpful thing would be to not attempt to start wars, and
particularly not on behalf of anyone or against individuals. We are all on
the same side here: trying to make the projects (and the project
interfaces, as a part of that) better. That includes, for instance, trying
out
Does either of you or anyone else see a valid reason to deny this
seemingly reasonable and considered request? It's quite obvious that hacks
to achieve the same ends are far from ideal. Why not simply disable
MediaViewer by default on the German Wikipedia, as requested?
In my view, the
On 14 Aug 2014 14:50, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:35 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
A pattern we see over and over is that the developers talk at length
about what they're working on in several venues, then it's released
and people claiming
I'm approaching this thread with some trepidation, but would someone mind
telling me more about this - or pointing to where this issue is already
documented? (I have no idea how to navigate Bugzilla ;) )
2. Specifically it appears that MV breaks CC-BY-SA-3.0. Details on
Bugzilla.
I was always a little surprised by the name Wikimedia Conference. After
all, that name would most logically belong to the big, open, week-long
event that draws over a thousand people together to talk about every aspect
of the movement.*
However, that event is already called Wikimania, which also
The word Conference doesn't in itself imply that an event is open or
closed.
C
On 12 Sep 2014 13:06, Ilario Valdelli valde...@gmail.com wrote:
But Wikimania is not only a Wikimedia Conference.
It's a conference open to all people outside the Wikimedia movement.
If the name should be as much
Of course the stark reality is that A/B testing on users (typically
readers, not editors) during the annual Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser
has been a major component of the Wikimedia Foundation's growth.
In part that's a myth. The income has been increased simply by making the
banners
However, by keeping the team's formation a secret, and not involving the
Chapters' financial staff in the conceptualisation stage (even as advanced
warning), does not start the concept off with good will.
While completely understanding the point you're making, I would mainly
suggest not
I'd like to add my own thanks to Jon - for doing so much to transform the
scale and impact of Wikimedia UK's work over the last three years, and for
your invaluable steadiness and tenacity in dealing with the very
significant challenges that the chapter's faced during that time.
Many best wishes
Interestingly I've just received a fundraising email localised to the UK
which doesn't offer any opportunity to give by direct debit. This is the
main form of regular giving in the UK, and the alternative that is offered
(regular gifts via credit card) is generally deprecated as it gives the
donor
Thanks Maria - really interesting to see such a thorough evaluation - as
well as good to see very positive feedback for the event.
I wondered out of curiousity if there was any discernable difference in
responses between long-term Wikimedians and people with less previous
exposure to the
British cheese is better than its reputation suggests, if you know where to
look. However British cheeses are difficult to distinguish from British
breeds of pig. Gloucester Old Spot, Lincolnshire Poacher, Oxford Sandy and
Black, Balcombe Brown Ring, Yarg, Mangalitsa - can you tell which is a pig
. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
*Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control
over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.*
On 29 November 2014 at 17:35, Chris Keating chriskeatingw
Which cheese do you use to coax a bear up a mountain?
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Pierre-Yves Beaudouin
pierre.beaudo...@wikimedia.fr wrote:
Le 2014-12-04 14:57, Martijn Hoekstra a écrit :
On Dec 4, 2014 2:46 PM, Jean-Frédéric jeanfrederic.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks again, I
Also, if anyone's interested in the latest news on Wikimedia UK's
governance, do have a look at our most recent governance audit - further
info here:
https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2014/11/final-report-on-wikimedia-uk-governance-released/
Some quotes include;
*“The charity has very largely
Hi Nathan,
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Wasn't there also an issue with WMUK processing payments, in that they
couldn't pass 100% of the donations on to the WMF but had to retain some or
most of the funds in order to remain independent under British law?
I have to say, I don't see anything remotely objectionable in that email.
Bold italicised text on a yellow background might not win any design awards
but effective fundraising often doesn't win design awards.*
I am not 100% sure how much donors care how soon our fundraiser ends (these
days at
Are you by any chance American?
Cheers,
peter
No, I'm English. :)
Chris
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
...@telkomsa.net wrote:
Are you by any chance American?
Cheers,
peter
-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Chris
Keating
Sent: 19 December 2014 01:47 PM
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Peter Southwood
peter.southw...@telkomsa.net wrote:
OK, I was just wondering if acceptance of this form of marketing was an
American thing or more generally an English language thing. Obviously not
universally acceptable to English speakers, even in USA and
Like Bence, I would be interested to see how this kind of experiment in WMF
grantmaking works out. And also like him I would be a little surprised if
something like this is implemented with no notice period.
A couple of responses to Lodewijk's post;
with people
confirming my fear that this
It's worth pointing out that the Board *are* responsible, even if they
aren't involved in the actual decision-making - as they are ultimately
responsible for everything WMF does.
Personally I think the present solution is better than no solution, as
cross-project disruption is not something the
My point is that reducing the number of anti WMF people in senior
positions on commons by one they might have converted some pro WMF people
in senior positions on commons to anti WMF people, producing more damage
for themselves than they hoped to create good.
I think if you're looking at
My point is that reducing the number of anti WMF people in senior
positions on commons by one they might have converted some pro WMF people
in senior positions on commons to anti WMF people, producing more damage
for themselves than they hoped to create good.
I think if you're looking
Thanks for the details Siko!
Going back to the original message in this thread - I would indeed be
concerned if the WMF was shutting down grantmaking for good projects for 3
months for no good reason.
However that's not really what's happening. It's more that non-urgent
grantmaking is being
As people have said - repeatedly - a bunch of trolls have set up a google
group mailing list that appears to be Wikimedia-l and subscribed lots of
people to it.
If you're subscribed then unsubscribe yourself and report it to Google.
There are instructions in other messages.
However, please
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:09 PM, FRED BAUDER fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:29:57 +0100
Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
As this thread demonstrates, what discussions about the massive
gender imbalance in Wikimedia editorship need is more men discussing why
it
Hi there,
That said, it doesn't matter who writes the content on Wikipedia so long
as it's relevant and factual.
Who is to decide what is relevant and factual (or indeed, the other
editorial judgements we make in writing aricles)? If the only people doing
that are white North American and
Curious question, by the way: how controversial would you expect this move
to be domestically? From e.g. a Swedish perspective, the NSA is an
intelligence agency of a foreign power and the other mentioned
organizations are either largely uncontroversial and seen in a positive
light (Amnesty,
I find the term Advancement Department has a somewhat Orwellian ring.
It's quite a normal term in the USA. For instance, the Council for
Advancement and Support of Education is the (global, but US-dominated)
professional body for university fundraisers.
Chris
I give this project FF out of a possible FF.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Christophe Henner
christophe.hen...@gmail.com wrote:
They are not free pixels.
Only real free pixels deserve to be counted.
Le 1 avr. 2015 23:00, Andrea Zanni zanni.andre...@gmail.com a écrit :
As
Congratulations to the new Board members - I am sure you will do a great
job. And commiserations to those who will be leaving the Board - thank you
for all your hard work over many years.
Also it is good to see a much higher turnout in this year's elections than
in 2013 - well done to those
I basically agree with the whole of Risker's post but want to expand in
this bit:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
There are not very many systems, though,
that are specifically designed to give multiple winners when one of the
conditions is that they *not*
I can definitely understand your frustration, Romaine.
However, if there is a strong operational reason why the Fundraising team
can't move the activity they have planned for Italy in September, then I
can't really see what resolution there can be except for sharing the banner
space.
Normally
Hi Romaine,
And the outcome is ridiculous. This is not a compromise. The Italian WLM
team has been crashed under the weight and preponderance of the Wikimedia
Foundation.
Well - it *is* a compromise. It isn't what you want and I think I
understand your reasons for thinking it will have a very
Really interesting - thanks for sharing!
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Denny Vrandečić
wrote:
> Very interesting read (via Brandon Harris):
>
>
> http://recode.net/2015/07/07/doing-something-about-the-impossible-problem-of-abuse-in-online-games/
>
> "the vast majority
Since October 27th there have been 3 threads, all started by the same
person, with a total of 5 posts .
None of which said anything at all confidential. :)
Chris
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Laurentius
wrote:
> At the end, is that mailing list currently active?
>
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo