/journal are now public domain. You'd also have
to check that the photographer didn't separately register/renew a
copyright on the photo. And, since photos don't typically have
convenient names or IDs to use for lookup, it can be pretty hard to check.
-Mark
On 6/24/12 8:22 AM, Eddie Erhart
to see us better enable the potentially
programming public, for one thing, where programming is taken in a
broad sense.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia
of the legwork to
advocacy organizations who focus on it.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
into category #3, which is sub-optimal but often needed.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
/ -- donated server space from MIT, and a
completely volunteer editorial process
* http://jair.org/ -- nonprofit organization with a small budget (funded
by donations and grants) pays for server space and a small staff
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
,
and/or why that'd be, I have no idea.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
categories that may be relevant to include in
this tracking somehow, using the term edited rather than derivative:
*
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Edited_versions_of_Flickr_originals
* http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Edited_images
-Mark
aren't able to figure it out. But lack of success in
convincing people to go to the library, find a book, and write a cited
article based on it. Most people, ime so far at least, just aren't
interested in doing that. Not sure how to change that, short of paying
editors.
-Mark
On 1/4/13 5:51 PM, George Herbert wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:05 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 January 2013 17:56, Mark delir...@hackish.org wrote:
1a. Do *not* pick a source that you have a particularly close personal or
emotional connection to: it is not good to start
Και εγώ συμφωνώ, ας γράψουμε σε όλες τις κλασικές γλώσσες. :)
- Μάρκος
On 3/12/13 3:44 AM, Erwin Mulialim wrote:
Good morning all,
I also strongly agree and support when we can use multi language in this mailing list, such as by including the Indonesian language into the “Wikimedia Mailing
,
rather than any kind of self-aggrandizement or POV-pushing, then we have
much in common.
-Mark
On 3/30/13 1:55 AM, Mono wrote:
Yes, but it might be nice if we could let people pay trusted editors to
improve articles (without a COI and with a NPOV) that normally wouldn't get
attention.
On Fri
through grants
to academic researchers, payments to contractors, hiring internal staff,
or posting open bounties for implementing features, I haven't thought
much about).
Best,
Mark
[1] They have a nice list of other software and data coming out of the
project as well: http
A brief addendum,
On 4/24/13 12:25 PM, Mark wrote:
From 2006 through 2012 [the ERC] allocated about $10m to kickstart
open-source MT, though focused primarily on European languages, via
the EuroMatrix (2006-09) and EuroMatrixPlus (2009-12) research projects.
Missed some projects. Seems
could get up to that level, that would be
a big win in itself.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
is going on. More
tedious and would of necessity be on a small subset of the encyclopedia,
but might avoid papering over things that are obvious when you look at
them but tend to get lost in big-data analyses.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
using VE don't see such
things.
From an editing perspective, it seems what's wanted here is a way to
mark regions of text, and then to specify what processing is done on
this region. As you note, {{foo|giant parameter consisting of the whole
region}} is one way to do that, but currently
On 7/30/13 11:23 PM, James Forrester wrote:
On 30 July 2013 13:58, Mark delir...@hackish.org wrote:
On 7/30/13 6:40 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) wrote:
From an editing perspective, it seems what's wanted here is a way to mark
regions of text, and then to specify what processing is done
the availability of German-language sources for the analogous
de.wiki articles, etc.).
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
Zealand: 1.8x
3. Australia: 1.5x
4. Canada: 1.4x
5. USA: 1.0x [baseline]
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
to understand the problem, if it is one, in more
detail.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject
On 12/12/13, 11:16 PM, David Gerard wrote:
On 12 December 2013 12:25, Mark delir...@hackish.org wrote:
Between tendentious negative information and self-promoting positive
information, I worry that the overall quality level of our biographies of
living people ends up poor in a great many cases
.
Best,
Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
on how to best contribute to society, without
having to worry about how to monetize and own every contribution.
But absent such significant change, perhaps the Wikimedia movement could
look more at how to improve at least the recognition (if not income) of
significant contributors.
Best,
Mark
grants, user-group recognition, etc. are opening
up more avenues for Wikimedian organizations, organized along different
lines, to find a more recognized (and funded) role in the movement.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l
like them too, saved I want it to be supervised by my chapter rather
than the WMF !
Mark, may you disclose which country you are from/live in ? I am
from France, living in France.
Since you asked: I am Greek by ethnicity, I live in Denmark, and I
mostly grew up in the USA. So I guess
too far in the other direction, of course. But
I think it's a more complex issue than Commons diverging from the
correct path.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
ambition is to be free only for Americans.
Perhaps es.wiki's goal will be to be free for Spaniards, and/or
Argentinians. de.wiki will be focused on freeness for Germans. etc. I
think that would be... suboptimal, though.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
On 3/2/14, 6:17 PM, David Gerard wrote:
On 2 March 2014 16:56, Mark delir...@hackish.org wrote:
On 3/2/14, 5:31 PM, Chris McKenna wrote:
There is a further disconnect in that Commons is taking an increasingly
ultra-conservative approach to the definition of Free, whereas most other
projects
be fine, and someone who knows the markup can prettify it later,
if necessary. (If newbies contributing in this manner are getting bad
reactions, then the message that this is a perfectly fine way to
contribute should be better publicized to existing editors/admins, too.)
-Mark
,
if such details are known. That's precisely the kind of information that
biographers search for when putting together a comprehensive biography.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
?
Best,
Mark
On 7/31/14, 12:15 AM, Lisa Gruwell wrote:
Hi Pine-
The threshold is an aggregate limit in a calendar year. If we were to
limit the donation amount to under $5000, a person could give several
donations that totaled over $5000 in a single year (which happens) and then
we would
these two lines through git/gerrit bureaucracy. But being sufficiently
annoyed, I did manage to submit a patch, which was eventually applied,
and after some delay that fixed the brokenness. But that experience led
me to believe that nobody is really paying attention to beta feedback!
-Mark
the new exporter ASAP.
Best,
Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia
not attribute photographers with their real name,
even when known.
Absent non-cc-licensed GFDL images, doing that may not be *legally*
required, but I think it's good practice and friendlier to do so.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
here
(Denmark), because the hard statistics show that most adult women (and
men) in the country are not married. Clearly other countries' statistics
(and statistics for demographic subsets of the same) will show other
numbers.
Best,
Mark
___
Wikimedia
by replacing the 3rd paragraph with this completely rewritten one:
:Draft of the rewritten paragraph is here.
Any thoughts on this change before I go ahead and make it? --
===
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org
that
have been imported to at least el and fr, in addition to de. So at least
in the past it's been used more widely.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l
as there is some format, the IDE can simply target that format. :-)
I can imagine many ways the markup format could be better, so by all
means let's improve it. But I can also imagine a lot of ways the
situation could be worse— such as not having a markup format!
Best,
Mark
.
-Mark
On 10/25/14, 9:46 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
People Who Are Able to Edit Articles But Not to Code dismiss wiki syntax
much more than I do.
Most of them don't even bother to begin to understand it. The few who do
are a rare exception. A wiki syntax IDE will not go a long way, as the
article
by the ISP (in this case, Wikipedia is favored),
which is precisely what net neutrality wishes to prohibit.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
Wikipedia? That's
already attempting to shape, via differential pricing, where online
users get their information.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
...
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
difficult to predict.
-Mark
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:41, Thomas Morton
morton.tho...@googlemail.comwrote:
What I think would be important to avoid is too much subjective information
from one individual; for example, where I to write about York, UK I would
recommend not going to the Jorvik centre (a main attraction)
We've mainly approached this issue encouraging the different groups of
travellers to add relevant content for their areas. We specifically try to
mix it all in, because we don't want to section anyone off. There was
considerable controversy back in 2005 or so about adding an LBGT section to
the
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org writes:
PS: Stakeholder's or Stakeholders?
I did send Gregory an email shortly after he notified me that we were
accepted when the problematic apostrophe was pointed out to me.
We'd like to have the apostrophe removed, if possible.
Mark.
--
Mark A. Hershberger
Gregory Varnum writes:
We have updated everything to reflect the correct spelling. Although it
sounds like now you'd like no apostrophe?
Yes.
I apologize for the confusion and extra work.
Mark.
--
Mark A. Hershberger
NicheWork LLC
717-271-1084
edia.org/p/MWF20160226/timeslider#959
[5] https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/MWF20160318/timeslider#1334
[6] http://mwstake.org/mwstake/wiki/Event:30
--
Mark A. Hershberger
NicheWork LLC
717-271-1084
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
http
of any vote at all:
London: Syed Kamall (Conservative)
South East: Janice Atkinson (independent), Raymond Finch (UKIP)
South West: Julia Reid (UKIP)
(Total 4 no record of any vote at all)
--
Mark Rousell
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
ttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/plenary/en/votes.html?tab=votes >
--
Mark Rousell
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikim
On 18/02/2019 11:04, David Cuenca Tudela wrote:
> the current definition of knowledge by Wikimedia
> projects is narrow-minded and does not fit the relationship with knowledge
> that exists in other parts of the world.
This sounds intriguing. Can you expand on it?
--
Mar
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 03/22/2014 02:45 PM, Russavia wrote:
It's already been established that there is massive copyvio in there,
and I think it is absolutely unacceptable for a copyvio to still be in
this article under the circumstances.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:47 AM, James Alexander
jalexan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Carlos M. Colina
ma...@wikimedia.org.vewrote:
Wait, are we in kindergarden? I think Rupert's email was sent off-list, so
basically there is no need to bring it up to the list,
If nothing else, the existing community quality rating system (i.e. FA, GA,
etc.) should be used. It may not be perfect at the individual article
level, but it does scale well.
On Mar 26, 2014 6:36 AM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
Philippe,
The Public Policy Initiative produced
See the graphs for 5+ editors here:
http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikibooks/EN/ChartsWikipediaZZ.htm
http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikiquote/EN/ChartsWikipediaZZ.htm
http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikinews/EN/ChartsWikipediaZZ.htm
It is wikinews that has been loosing contributors since mid 2008, and
new
There are 36 hours remaining for nominations for the affiliate-selected
seats. Self-nominations are allowed.
The two existing chapter appointed board members, Patricio Lorente and
Alice Wiegand, are currently the only candidates, which will save a lot of
volunteer time in the selection process.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 April 2014 15:23, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com
wrote:
After
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Anna Torres a...@wikimedia.org.ar wrote:
Hi Isabella,
Great news! Congratulations to all of you :)
In Argentina we are planning to build up a fundraising strategy this year.
Is there somewhere we can take a look to the project?
While the WMID team puts online
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Kevin Gorman kgor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Yann -
Commons is unique in that AFAIK it's our only project that, by it's very
nature, effects other projects, as well as outside collaborations.
Well, no, it isnt.
Wikidata also has a direct effect on the other
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:42 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Nathan wrote:
A lot of the issues Kevin is probably referring to revolve around the 2011
debate, and many of the most blatant problems have since been cleaned up.
Perhaps some of the most blatant problems have been addressed,
I think intersection is the most significant cause of the current
categorisation system.
My understanding of the current reasoning behind categorisation as seen on
Commons and elsewhere is that:
1) the lack of category intersection causes the very specific categories,
which are essentially saved
On May 29, 2014 5:33 AM, Thyge ltl.pri...@gmail.com wrote:
Please raise and discuss questions about policy on meta. This is not the
place.
Regards,
Thyge
Wil, I suggest that you do go to http://meta.wikimedia.org and find pages
about these issues. *Read the archives of the talk pages*. And
Wil,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
Stepping in to add another aspect to both questions, as I think it
might focus the discussion.
Child Protection: Are children encouraged to use commons through any
programs or outreach efforts of any kind?
Who are you
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
I'm starting a thread with the correct title, so that everyone knows
that we're discussing whether I should be banned and for what reasons.
Like Sam said in another thread, I doubt you would be blocked on this
list, and there
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
As I mentioned to Sam, I have just one more thing to say here before I
let you guys deliberate on whether to block me.
I've been getting tons of private emails from people who say that they
don't want to see me blocked, but
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:43 AM, C. Scott Ananian
canan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
This is a fascinating discussion, but one which has been addressed in
much greater depth elsewhere:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=net+neutrality+wikipedia+zero
It would indeed be interesting to hear EFF's take on the
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:12 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Many new features (e.g., the improved search backend) are deployed fairly
regularly
without fanfare or objection.
Indeed, change-aversion tends to
'On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:02 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
Or .. sometimes the licensing and attribution information isnt
correct
In the common case, Media Viewer provides more prominent
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:59 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Wil Sinclair wrote:
Hi all, I've started a new wiki called Offwiki: http://offwiki.org.
Our community discusses potential changes to Wikipedia and its
Wikimedia sister projects that aren't easily discussed in forums like
this
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you able to specify which policy or statement entitles you to the
information you request? I can find no basis for it in the privacy policy,
the Meta checkuser policy or the checkuser page on Commons. Can you also
outline for
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
..
I could be wrong, but it was my understanding that the logs are maintained
indefinitely but the data is retained for only 3 months (i.e. the results
of the check that is recorded in the log).
The checkuser log are kept
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure you're correct about what is being disappeared, Fae. I
believe that the Guardian is referring to an article of theirs that is now
not seen in Google search results for certain terms. The article makes it
pretty
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:27 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure you're correct about what is being disappeared, Fae. I
believe that the Guardian is referring to an article of theirs that is now
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:08 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 10 August 2014 15:51, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
You'd been threatening to implement super-protection for a long time. I
see you finally made good on this very bad idea. This is certainly bold,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Brian Wolff bawo...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, having observed that not only user Eloquence (aka Erik Moeller)
himself engaged in the enforcement of superprotect right on de.wp
[1] but soon after a workaround was published a change was deployed
[2, 3] as counter
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
bjor...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:01 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
Before this, there was no expectation that a page could be protected
such that sysops could not alter the content
Hi,
Has Odder / Tomasz Kozłowski been put on moderation?
I'm informed his emails sent to this list havent come through to the
list for nearly 24 hrs, and he has not been notified of having been
put on any moderation, and the moderators havent responded to queries
sent directly, and havent
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
The big question is not so much where and when things happen, the big
question is who supports all the muck. There have been enough instances
where changes to for instance common.js brought down servers.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 August 2014 05:31, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-08-21 9:30 GMT+03:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com:
It would *seem* that every user
converted to the mobile site is a step towards extinction of the
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 08/24/2014 11:19 PM, Pine W wrote:
I have
heard people say don't force an interface change on me that I don't think
is an improvement.
I do not recall a recent interface change deployment that wasn't
accompanied
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
I'd like to add distribution as one of the pain points. I wanted to
have the templates that are available on enwiki for another Mediawiki
installation, but I couldn't get them to work. It seems like every
template has a maze of
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
This somewhat circuitously brings us back to the subject. We have a
chance to rollout Flow the right way. There are some questions that
come to mind that might tell us if we're headed for a big win or a
bigger debacle:
1) Is
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:48 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
IMO the WMF should stop focusing on English Wikipedia as a target
deploy site, and stop allowing its product management team and WMF
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-09-06 1:07 GMT+02:00 Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:48 PM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
IMO the WMF should stop focusing on English Wikipedia as a target
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 09/07/2014 01:57 AM, Diego Moya wrote:
a major property of a document-centric architecture that is lost in a
structured one is that it's open-ended, which means that end users can
build new features and flows on top
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yann,
The Commons app would need lots of love to continue to be worth advertising
as a mainline app. It's not been updated since October, and code rot sets
in after a while (I can easily reproduce crashes when logging in
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Dan Garry dga...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thanks to all in this thread for raising these issues.
A discussion about sunsetting the Commons Android app is ongoing on
mobile-l right now. I would encourage anyone who's interested to subscribe
and comment.
Hi Dam,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
Tim, do you think that this list of all the useful stuff that talk
pages can currently includes things that aren't being done because
they are too advanced for newbie editors or too inconvenient for
veterans?
Regardless, you
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Wil Sinclair w...@wllm.com wrote:
Actually, I'd like to speak up on the name.
I imagine the name reflected the enthusiasm of its first attendees,
but Wikimania has all the wrong connotations in today's world. True
mania is marked by little control, commitment,
/Special:CentralAuth/DannyH_(WMF)
Danny will no doubt hit the 300 global edit mark by the cutoff date
which would be ~March 2014., roughly one year after he started. I
suspect he may also meet any sensible criteria established for merged
patches, but havent checked that.
If we include the wikitech
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 October 2014 20:51, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 10/05/2014 08:24 AM, John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
I checked a few of the WMF admin staff who have been employed more
than a year, and many dont look likely
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
John, please explain what your point is here. I mean really, picking on
individual people who voted in the election? That's crossing the line,
especially as they met the voting eligibility criteria for the election
involved,
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does the questionnaire seemingly exclude the WMF?
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Organizational_effectiveness/Tool/User_guide#Preparing_to_Take_the_Organizational_Effectiveness_Questionnaire
If the WMF is one
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Anasuya! That's quite a comprehensive survey but instructive to
fill out.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:46 AM, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, .. from the survey itself:
Throughout, we use
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Lila Tretikov l...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I would like to expose this more, maybe after this crunch. Just keep in
mind that it takes time to anonymize and process -- a time that is
otherwise spent on optimizing or collaborating. One bucket of resources,
many
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:46 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
i.e. specifically asking
previously highly productive volunteers who have stopped contributing
whether they feel the increase in funds has not resulted in their work
being adequately
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
On 04.12.2014 02:30, John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:46 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
John Mark Vandenberg wrote:
i.e. specifically asking
previously highly productive
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Nick Birse w...@nbir.se wrote:
Russavia asked me to check this to confirm it wasn't just him or his
regional Google setup, and it's both correct and looking into it further
it's hitting every single page on Wikipedia that Google has indexed.
If you search for
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipe...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks John for the link.
I've made an edit to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ushuaia_%E2%80%93_Malvinas_Argentinas_International_Airport
as I've been told that Google will update text in their search results when
Comparisons to PBS/TV are not a useful pro-Wikipedia Zero argument, as
the TV network model is itself a convincing argument effectively used
by the pro-net-neutrality people as a worst case outcome of eroding
net neutrality - most people agree we need to avoid the Internet
descending to a TV
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
