Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with support of bots)

2013-06-16 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
is a bonus. Best of wishes, /Per A.J. Andersson (user: Paracel63) 2013-06-16, 16:03, skrev Federico Leva (Nemo): Article count milestones are nice! However, I remind those who were distracted in 2008 that article count is a largely irrelevant piece of our statistics since 2008; both

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: Fwd: Re: Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with supportof bots)

2013-06-17 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
Hi! Sad for seeing you so disappointed. Good to see you have insight in butterflies. So I hope you will make your knowledge visible on dewp, where neither genera so far have found its way into articles. enwp (together with viwp!) has at least the genus Jameela as an article. That aside, is

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipe dia reach (…)

2013-06-18 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
2013-06-18, 00:57, skrev Ziko van Dijk: Hello, I am also unhappy with the mail from Hubertl, and also some remarks that good be understood as a criticism of the German Wikipedia editing community. Actually, both opinions coexist also in de.WP, although the anti bot faction is obviously

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with support of bots)

2013-06-18 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
I am a bit suprised about the lack of trying to understand and develop mindsets here. I joined this mailing list the other day in the belief that it was directed at discussing current topics in the Wikimedia community in a constructive manner. So far I have not found overwhelming proof of

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipedia reach (...)

2013-06-18 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
Very good point. (Personally I think building a localised Wikispecies – with the potential to grow – inside a Wikipedia version is something good.) Many thanks, /Per Wikipedia user Paracel63 2013-06-18, 14:50, skrev Gerard Meijssen: Hear, hear Thanks, GerardM Op 18 jun. 2013 12:08 schreef

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with support of bots)

2013-06-18 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
2013-06-18, 06:34, skrev Hubertl: Loosing our original idea for which this project is donated by thousands of donaters! From which you are paid for. As an unpaid, long term Wikipedian in Residence I do know what I´m talking about. Hello! I'm interested in knowing more of your experience

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipedia reach 1 million (with support of bots)

2013-06-18 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
Many thanks for the resumé. I thought it would be like this, as I've followed the development of the different wikipedias (content and key factors) since 2008. BTW, is there a (searchable) list archive? Best of wishes, /Per 2013-06-18, 17:29, skrev Nathan: Hi Per, The discussions on this

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipe dia reaches (…)

2013-06-18 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
Great idea! I'm going to try a way of doing this, through svwp and/or WMSE. Best of wishes, /Per Wikipedia user Paracel63 2013-06-18, 17:53, skrev David Cuenca: Instead of just discussing this topic as always has been done, it would be great to take advantage of the opportunity to monitor

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikipedia in jail!

2013-06-19 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
2013-06-19, 10:13, skrev rupert THURNER: Hi Robert, no censoring, filtering, or monitoring. Its the full French wikipedia. Afaiu emmanuel it was not discussed, but he explicitly pointed out that all articles are there including the ones about arms. Interesting. Do you know how much data that

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Erik Zachte on bot-generated articles

2013-06-23 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
2013-06-23, 10:34, skrev Jane Darnell: I totally agree (disclaimer: I don't have a bot, but I have been actively flooding the engish wikipedia with artist stubs for years, and have used municipality stubs created by bots to anchor their hometowns, working places, and death towns) I'm hoping

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Erik Zachte on bot-generated articles

2013-06-23 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
2013-06-23, 12:33, skrev Ilario Valdelli: I am not in the opposition of the use of the bots, if these bots will have their place and the articles generated by bots are considered like *populated templates* and not like articles. I think that a solution like this (the pages generated by bots

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Erik Zachte on bot-generated articles

2013-06-23 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
and style over time. Best of wishes, /Per 2013-06-23, 13:06, skrev Per A.J. Andersson: 2013-06-23, 12:33, skrev Ilario Valdelli: I am not in the opposition of the use of the bots, if these bots will have their place and the articles generated by bots are considered like *populated templates

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Invitation to WMF November 201 4 Metrics…

2014-12-05 Thread Per A.J. Andersson
any detailed info of those device defaults. Do you know more about what kinds of devices, what kinds of applications, the reasoning involved and any talk of trends? I'd be very happy to know more on the subject. :-) Best of wishes, /Per A.J. Andersson, Göteborg, Sweden (Wikipedia user