Re: [Wikimedia-l] FDC R1 funding recommendations are posted
Thanks - I hope it wasn't too grueling a week for you and everyone else on the FDC. Jon. On 24 November 2013 16:59, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl wrote: Hello friends, The Funds Dissemination Committee meets twice annually to help make decisions about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve the Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. [1] On behalf of the committee, I am pleased to announce that Round 1 2013-2014 recommendations to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees have now been posted on Meta. [2] The WMF Board will make their decision on these recommendations by 1 January 2014. For the first round of this fiscal year, the committee received 11 proposals. [3] These eleven proposals came from ten chapters and one thematic organization, totaling requests of $5.9 million USD. Prior to our face-to-face deliberations in San Francisco from 17-21 November, the FDC reviewed the proposals in careful detail, aided by staff assessments and analysis on programs, finances, grant compliance and history, as well as community comments on the proposals. Staff presented an overview of these findings to the FDC during the deliberations. The FDC and FDC staff also asked clarifying questions to the entities on the proposal form discussion pages during the four-week community review period (and prior to the publishing of staff assessments), and observed the discussions about the proposals. The committee thanks all entities that submitted proposals, as it required significant effort to both create the proposal and to respond to the questions and feedback from the community, FDC, and FDC staff. We sincerely appreciate them all for this work. For formal complaints or appeals about the recommendations, there is a separate process that entities should follow. Note that at the request of many stakeholders, we are clarifying the complaints and appeals terminology so that complaints are made about the process to the ombudsperson and appeals on the recommendations are made to the WMF Board representatives. These are further explained below: Any entity that would like to submit an appeal on the FDC’s Round 1 recommendation should submit it to the Board representatives to the FDC by 23:59 UTC on 8 December 2013 in accordance with the appeal process outlined in the FDC Framework. The process is as follows: Appeals to the WMF Board on the recommendations of the FDC (formerly called complaints, terminology changed to avoid further confusion): * A formal appeal to challenge the FDC’s recommendation should be in the form of a 500-or-fewer word summary directed to the two non-voting WMF Board representatives to the FDC (Patricio Lorente and Bishakha Datta). * The appeal should be submitted on-wiki through the FDC portal page designated for this purpose. [4] * Formal appeals can be submitted only by the Board Chair of a funding-seeking entity. * Formal appeals must be filed within seven days of the deadline for submission of the FDC slate of recommendations to the WMF Board, even if the recommendations are published before the deadline for the recommendations i.e. end-of-day 1 December 2013. The deadline for appeals is the end-of-day UTC on 8 December. * These board representatives will present the appeal to the WMF Board at the same time as the Board considers the FDC recommendation. However, all responses to an appeal will be made seven days after the deadline for the appeal, i.e. by end-of-day UTC 15 December 2013. * Any planned or approved disbursements to the organization filing an appeal will be put on hold until the appeal is resolved. * If the WMF Board's consideration of the appeal results in an amendment of the FDC's recommendations (which is expected only in extraordinary circumstances), the WMF Board may choose to release extra funds from the WMF reserves to provide additional funds not allocated by the FDC's initial recommendation. * The Ombudsperson, as well as members of the WMF Board other than the Board representatives, may participate in the investigation if approved by the Chair of the WMF Board. Complaints to the ombudsperson about the FDC process (formerly called appeals): * A complaint about the FDC process can be filed by anyone with the Ombudsperson and can be made any time during a particular round of the FDC process (e.g. in this instance, from start July 2013 to end December 2013). * The complaint should be submitted on wiki, through the FDC portal page designated for this purpose [5] * The ombudsperson will receive and publicly document the complaint, and investigate the complaint, as needed. On behalf of the FDC, pundit Dariusz Jemielniak (FDC Chair) [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Framework_for_the_Creation_and_Initial_Operation_of_the_FDC [2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_round1 [3]
[Wikimedia-l] FDC R1 funding recommendations are posted
Hello friends, The Funds Dissemination Committee meets twice annually to help make decisions about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve the Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. [1] On behalf of the committee, I am pleased to announce that Round 1 2013-2014 recommendations to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees have now been posted on Meta. [2] The WMF Board will make their decision on these recommendations by 1 January 2014. For the first round of this fiscal year, the committee received 11 proposals. [3] These eleven proposals came from ten chapters and one thematic organization, totaling requests of $5.9 million USD. Prior to our face-to-face deliberations in San Francisco from 17-21 November, the FDC reviewed the proposals in careful detail, aided by staff assessments and analysis on programs, finances, grant compliance and history, as well as community comments on the proposals. Staff presented an overview of these findings to the FDC during the deliberations. The FDC and FDC staff also asked clarifying questions to the entities on the proposal form discussion pages during the four-week community review period (and prior to the publishing of staff assessments), and observed the discussions about the proposals. The committee thanks all entities that submitted proposals, as it required significant effort to both create the proposal and to respond to the questions and feedback from the community, FDC, and FDC staff. We sincerely appreciate them all for this work. For formal complaints or appeals about the recommendations, there is a separate process that entities should follow. Note that at the request of many stakeholders, we are clarifying the complaints and appeals terminology so that complaints are made about the process to the ombudsperson and appeals on the recommendations are made to the WMF Board representatives. These are further explained below: Any entity that would like to submit an appeal on the FDC’s Round 1 recommendation should submit it to the Board representatives to the FDC by 23:59 UTC on 8 December 2013 in accordance with the appeal process outlined in the FDC Framework. The process is as follows: Appeals to the WMF Board on the recommendations of the FDC (formerly called complaints, terminology changed to avoid further confusion): * A formal appeal to challenge the FDC’s recommendation should be in the form of a 500-or-fewer word summary directed to the two non-voting WMF Board representatives to the FDC (Patricio Lorente and Bishakha Datta). * The appeal should be submitted on-wiki through the FDC portal page designated for this purpose. [4] * Formal appeals can be submitted only by the Board Chair of a funding-seeking entity. * Formal appeals must be filed within seven days of the deadline for submission of the FDC slate of recommendations to the WMF Board, even if the recommendations are published before the deadline for the recommendations i.e. end-of-day 1 December 2013. The deadline for appeals is the end-of-day UTC on 8 December. * These board representatives will present the appeal to the WMF Board at the same time as the Board considers the FDC recommendation. However, all responses to an appeal will be made seven days after the deadline for the appeal, i.e. by end-of-day UTC 15 December 2013. * Any planned or approved disbursements to the organization filing an appeal will be put on hold until the appeal is resolved. * If the WMF Board's consideration of the appeal results in an amendment of the FDC's recommendations (which is expected only in extraordinary circumstances), the WMF Board may choose to release extra funds from the WMF reserves to provide additional funds not allocated by the FDC's initial recommendation. * The Ombudsperson, as well as members of the WMF Board other than the Board representatives, may participate in the investigation if approved by the Chair of the WMF Board. Complaints to the ombudsperson about the FDC process (formerly called appeals): * A complaint about the FDC process can be filed by anyone with the Ombudsperson and can be made any time during a particular round of the FDC process (e.g. in this instance, from start July 2013 to end December 2013). * The complaint should be submitted on wiki, through the FDC portal page designated for this purpose [5] * The ombudsperson will receive and publicly document the complaint, and investigate the complaint, as needed. On behalf of the FDC, pundit Dariusz Jemielniak (FDC Chair) [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Framework_for_the_Creation_and_Initial_Operation_of_the_FDC [2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_round1 [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Proposals [4] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Appeals_to_the_Board_on_the_recommendations_of_the_FDC [5] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Complaints_about_the_FDC_process
Re: [Wikimedia-l] FDC R1 funding recommendations are posted
Many thanks for the considerable hard work that has gone into this process from the FDC and the staff assisting them. Regards, Chris On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.plwrote: Hello friends, The Funds Dissemination Committee meets twice annually to help make decisions about how to effectively allocate movement funds to achieve the Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. [1] On behalf of the committee, I am pleased to announce that Round 1 2013-2014 recommendations to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees have now been posted on Meta. [2] The WMF Board will make their decision on these recommendations by 1 January 2014. For the first round of this fiscal year, the committee received 11 proposals. [3] These eleven proposals came from ten chapters and one thematic organization, totaling requests of $5.9 million USD. Prior to our face-to-face deliberations in San Francisco from 17-21 November, the FDC reviewed the proposals in careful detail, aided by staff assessments and analysis on programs, finances, grant compliance and history, as well as community comments on the proposals. Staff presented an overview of these findings to the FDC during the deliberations. The FDC and FDC staff also asked clarifying questions to the entities on the proposal form discussion pages during the four-week community review period (and prior to the publishing of staff assessments), and observed the discussions about the proposals. The committee thanks all entities that submitted proposals, as it required significant effort to both create the proposal and to respond to the questions and feedback from the community, FDC, and FDC staff. We sincerely appreciate them all for this work. For formal complaints or appeals about the recommendations, there is a separate process that entities should follow. Note that at the request of many stakeholders, we are clarifying the complaints and appeals terminology so that complaints are made about the process to the ombudsperson and appeals on the recommendations are made to the WMF Board representatives. These are further explained below: Any entity that would like to submit an appeal on the FDC’s Round 1 recommendation should submit it to the Board representatives to the FDC by 23:59 UTC on 8 December 2013 in accordance with the appeal process outlined in the FDC Framework. The process is as follows: Appeals to the WMF Board on the recommendations of the FDC (formerly called complaints, terminology changed to avoid further confusion): * A formal appeal to challenge the FDC’s recommendation should be in the form of a 500-or-fewer word summary directed to the two non-voting WMF Board representatives to the FDC (Patricio Lorente and Bishakha Datta). * The appeal should be submitted on-wiki through the FDC portal page designated for this purpose. [4] * Formal appeals can be submitted only by the Board Chair of a funding-seeking entity. * Formal appeals must be filed within seven days of the deadline for submission of the FDC slate of recommendations to the WMF Board, even if the recommendations are published before the deadline for the recommendations i.e. end-of-day 1 December 2013. The deadline for appeals is the end-of-day UTC on 8 December. * These board representatives will present the appeal to the WMF Board at the same time as the Board considers the FDC recommendation. However, all responses to an appeal will be made seven days after the deadline for the appeal, i.e. by end-of-day UTC 15 December 2013. * Any planned or approved disbursements to the organization filing an appeal will be put on hold until the appeal is resolved. * If the WMF Board's consideration of the appeal results in an amendment of the FDC's recommendations (which is expected only in extraordinary circumstances), the WMF Board may choose to release extra funds from the WMF reserves to provide additional funds not allocated by the FDC's initial recommendation. * The Ombudsperson, as well as members of the WMF Board other than the Board representatives, may participate in the investigation if approved by the Chair of the WMF Board. Complaints to the ombudsperson about the FDC process (formerly called appeals): * A complaint about the FDC process can be filed by anyone with the Ombudsperson and can be made any time during a particular round of the FDC process (e.g. in this instance, from start July 2013 to end December 2013). * The complaint should be submitted on wiki, through the FDC portal page designated for this purpose [5] * The ombudsperson will receive and publicly document the complaint, and investigate the complaint, as needed. On behalf of the FDC, pundit Dariusz Jemielniak (FDC Chair) [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Framework_for_the_Creation_and_Initial_Operation_of_the_FDC [2]
