As I undestand it, the Swedish Supreme Court determined the general
principles of law involved and remitted the case back to the Patent and
Market Court to resolve the specific issues between the parties.
"Rogol"
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> I thought that case was los
I thought that case was lost over a year ago, in the Swedish Supreme Court:
http://fortune.com/2016/04/05/wikimedia-sweden-artworks/
What happened between then and now for this to end up in the Swedish Patent
and Market Court?
Andreas
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
For reference, I believe Fae refers to the Defense of Contributors Fund:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/Legal_Policies#Defense_of_Contributors
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Fæ wrote:
> John,
>
> The WMF has a large legal fund to support volunteers and projects like
> Commons, which from
John,
The WMF has a large legal fund to support volunteers and projects like
Commons, which from my memory has only ever been paid out on a couple
of occasions (if anyone has a link to a list, I love to see it). At
least part of the 89,000 USD mentioned seems suitable for this
emergency funding, e
Well bummer. I hope that you can figure out a good lobbying next step.
Cheers,
Alex
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:41 AM, John Andersson wrote:
> Today we received some bad news in Sweden. The Swedish Patent and Market
> Court ruled against Wikimedia Sverige in a lawsuit filed by Visual
> Copyright