Although we discussed about that more extensively off-list, I just
wanted to make publicly clear that:
- I don't make "forum-shopping", I batch reply to some messages where my
name was explicitely appearing in the message body. I have close to 2000
untreated messages in the Wikimedia
Hi Andra,
Le 04/07/2018 à 13:00, Andra Waagmeester a écrit :
No, Wikidata is not going to change the CC0. You seem to be the
only person wanting that and trying to discredit Wikidata will not
help you in your crusade. I suggest the people who are still
interested in this to
Hello,
Mathieu, not only are you forum-shopping here as Maarten pointed out, you
are also consecutively trying one "what if" after the other instead of
providing an actual formal case against the CC0 license currently in effect
on Wikidata.
So far each of your individual arguments has been
Hi,
2018-07-04 12:50 GMT+02:00 Maarten Dammers :
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> So I see you started forum shopping (trying to get the Wikimedia-l people
> in) and making contentious trying to be funny remarks. That's usually a
> good indication a thread is going nowhere.
>
> No, Wikidata is not going to
Hi Mathieu,
On 04-07-18 11:07, mathieu stumpf guntz wrote:
Hi,
Le 19/05/2018 à 03:35, Denny Vrandečić a écrit :
Regarding attribution, commonly it is assumed that you have to
respect it transitively. That is one of the reasons a license that
requires BY sucks so hard for data: unlike with
Hi,
Le 19/05/2018 à 03:35, Denny Vrandečić a écrit :
Regarding attribution, commonly it is assumed that you have to respect
it transitively. That is one of the reasons a license that requires BY
sucks so hard for data: unlike with text, the attribution requirements
grow very quickly. It is
Thank you for your answer, Sebastian.
Publishing the Gutachten would be fantastic! That would be very helpful and
deeply appreciated.
Regarding the relicensing, I agree with you. You can just go and do that,
and given that you ask for attribution to DBpedia, and not to Wikipedia, I
would claim
