It's odd, but I think I'm glad - not so much that you're leaving, but
where you're going, what you intend to do... somehow I find that
comforting...
On 27/03/13 22:00, Sue Gardner wrote:
Hello Wikimedia community members,
This is not an easy e-mail to write, and it’s been a very hard
We all started talking about Sue Gardner for President 2016 on IRC today. I'd
vote for her...
Sent from my iPhone
On 28/03/2013, at 6:35 PM, Isarra Yos zhoris...@gmail.com wrote:
It's odd, but I think I'm glad - not so much that you're leaving, but where
you're going, what you intend to
That's big news. I agree with Jan-Bart, Phoebe (thanks for the laugh),
Manuel, and Isarra. In my own editor's corner of Wikipedia, I have
increasingly come up against the limits of Wikipedia against
international copyright law on the one hand, and the inability to
express my concerns in 160 bytes
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Steven Zhang cro0...@gmail.com wrote:
We all started talking about Sue Gardner for President 2016 on IRC today.
I'd vote for her...
In order to do so, there are two minor prerequisites
a) We must get rid of the clause in Section 1 of Article Two of the
United
On 28 March 2013 09:52, Mathias Schindler mathias.schind...@gmail.com wrote:
b) We must overthrow the political system in Canada and change the
monarchy into a republic that actually has a President so that Sue can
run for it.
There's always running on the My name is not Stephen Harper
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Mathias Schindler
mathias.schind...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Steven Zhang cro0...@gmail.com wrote:
We all started talking about Sue Gardner for President 2016 on IRC today.
I'd vote for her...
In order to do so, there are two minor
Sue DID seem to enjoy herself when she was here recently. Hell, I'd settle
for Premier of Queensland at this rate. Whaddaya say, Sue?
Cheers,
Craig
On 28/03/2013 8:02 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Mathias Schindler
mathias.schind...@gmail.com
As others have wrote, it is still not a farewell email. But there is no
doubt that Sue, despite past disagreements we had, is an asset to
the foundation and our movement. And it's going to be a very big challenge
to find someone who will replace her. I'll wait with the real farewell
email :)
huh. I understand and respect the reasoning perfectly well, and yet I can't
help a feeling that WIkimedia movement is going to suffer a major loss. Sue
has been pivotal in making WMF and the movement successfully grow to where
we are now. It will be really hard to find anyone nearly as competent
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak dar...@alk.edu.pl wrote:
One piece of thought (without looking much into the technicalities):
Perhaps the movement could really benefit from an ex-exec of this caliber
getting a new seat on the Board.
or more probably the Advisory
hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Guillaume Paumier
guillom@gmail.comwrote:
or more probably the Advisory board :)
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Advisory_Board
I meant the Board of Trustees, as I think that Sue's experience would be
really beneficial there (probably, for a
Dariusz Jemielniak, 28/03/2013 13:00:
[...] The
Advisory Board is a much less active and decisive body in my view, which is
not to say that Sue's input there would not be really useful as well.
Sounds like a good reason to make it stronger.
Nemo
Oh Sue, I still can't believe I am reading this mail! Though we will have
you for another 6 months, but it will be very hard to say goodbye. I
believe your departure would only mean your leaving the organization of WMF
and you will remain an indispensable part of the movement as ever. I am
13 matches
Mail list logo
