Link does not work.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Nicole Askin
Sent: 16 July 2014 04:00 AM
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] AFD survey
We are looking
the http:// part has been left out.
Correct link is
http://fluidsurveys.com/s/WikipediaSurvey/
Regards
Sir48/Thyge
2014-07-16 8:29 GMT+02:00 Peter Southwood peter.southw...@telkomsa.net:
Link does not work.
Cheers,
Peter
-Original Message-
From:
Dear UWO Wikipedia Research Team,
Your survey does not appear to have been approved by the Wikimedia
Research Committee (RCom). You can find contact details at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_Committee.
Due to concerns with regard to privacy, such as recording their IP
address against
Thanks. All questions were generic and about Wikipedia, so I answered
with the Italian Wikipedia in mind. Also note that it.wiki is perhaps
the only wiki which switched deletions from voting to non-voting: the
experiment was already done, you only need to measure and interpret it.
:-) See
In Polish Wikipedia there is no voting for deletion for around 3-4
years. There is discussion and then final decission is made by one of
admins who regularly maintains the deletion process.
2014-07-16 10:20 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com:
Thanks. All questions were generic and
If the people who have created this survey can fix the problems raised by
Fae, I'd be happy to share this with several language Wikipedians in India.
I'm sure that at this point nobody would want to be part of it.
On Jul 16, 2014 1:54 PM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
In Polish
English hasn't used voting for a long time either. AfD discussions are
closed based on strength of argument and compliance with policy.
On Jul 16, 2014 2:24 AM, Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com wrote:
In Polish Wikipedia there is no voting for deletion for around 3-4
years. There is discussion
I would suggest that it doesn't become not a vote merely by not
calling it a vote. I note all the closes that count !votes and how
the not-voting pattern on a given AFD is frequently brought up at DRV.
On 16 July 2014 12:25, Todd Allen toddmal...@gmail.com wrote:
English hasn't used voting for a
Hello,
I feel that this is an unethical research project and I have told the
researcher so. We exchanged several emails and were unable to understand
each other. I asked them to please have their university ethics board
contact me.
I asked the researcher about RCOM and other things. This person
David Gerard, 16/07/2014 13:34:
I would suggest that it doesn't become not a vote merely by not
calling it a vote. I note all the closes that count !votes and how
the not-voting pattern on a given AFD is frequently brought up at DRV.
Sure, but calling it a vote makes it a vote. If it's
On 16 July 2014 12:39, Lane Rasberry l...@bluerasberry.com wrote:
...
I asked this researcher to discontinue the survey pending a check on the
impact of it on the Wikipedia community. I said this because I feel they
are out of compliance with even the soft suggestions in research that are
Good points, Lane. Such things were possibly discussed before, but it's the
first time that I see it it spelled out like this.
This approach should be advertised a bit somehow, so that the researchers
know how to do it ethically and for everybody's benefit, and so that the
experienced Wikipedians
On 07/16/2014 07:44 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
AFAIK deletion has
never been a vote by policy on en.wiki.
No, but it almost always devolves to a vote de facto. Interestingly
enough, that particular question (did you close discussions by counting
show of hand vs evaluating the rationales)
the bulk of such
non-vote discussions.
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:43:48 +0300
From: Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] AFD survey
Message-ID:
CACtNa8tHeMQRxjnsGHdHDG5B
On 16 July 2014 12:34, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I would suggest that it doesn't become not a vote merely by not
calling it a vote. I note all the closes that count !votes and how
the not-voting pattern on a given AFD is frequently brought up at DRV.
Vote-counting is increasingly
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Lane Rasberry l...@bluerasberry.com
wrote:
Hello,
I feel that this is an unethical research project and I have told the
researcher so. We exchanged several emails and were unable to understand
each other. I asked them to please have their university ethics
To avoid confusion with researchers in the future, I've made some minor
changes to the research related pages on Meta (see below). This should help
ensure that outdated documentation does not cause unnecessarily delay
and/or expense for those interested in doing Wikimedia-related research.
1:
17 matches
Mail list logo
