Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] The Revision Scoring weekly update

Hoi, I so agree but when it is quality that is to be achieved let it be a guidance that helps us to achieve quality. Wikidata should bring things together. I do not aim to achieve the quality as described because it fails in achieving things that are actionable and have a measurable effect on the

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] The Revision Scoring weekly update

Hey, It's in arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03861 Any feedback is welcome :) Best On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:37 PM Richard Nevell < richard.nev...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > Having guidance on quality helps people learning about Wikidata understand > what they should be aiming for. > > The

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] The Revision Scoring weekly update

Having guidance on quality helps people learning about Wikidata understand what they should be aiming for. The paper on vandalism detection in Wikidata sounds interesting, where can I find it? Richard On 17 March 2017 at 09:09, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > Hoi, > I

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] The Revision Scoring weekly update

Hoi, I noticed the notion about "quality in Wikidata". The approach is very much in line with what is the norm in Wikipedia. This is inot the right approach for Wikidata. Many of the items in Wikidata can be of high "quality"; ie the statements have a source and there are enough labels but the