On 18/06/13 01:04, Martin Rulsch wrote:
As far as I know, that's even planned by the Wikidata team.
It isn't exactly planned by the Wikidata tema, a volunteer would need to
do it.
2013/6/18 Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nl
Hello,
I am also unhappy with the mail from Hubertl, and also
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
On 18/06/13 01:04, Martin Rulsch wrote:
As far as I know, that's even planned by the Wikidata team.
It isn't exactly planned by the Wikidata tema, a volunteer would need to do
it.
What exactly are you talking about
Seriously, are we discussing again about bot stubs yes, bot stubs no?
Those users who want to submit complete 10-page articles, can move to the
defunct Nupedia or the 'vibrant' Citizendium.
This eternal discussion is so boring.
2013/6/18 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
On Tue,
Hear, hear
Thanks,
GerardM
Op 18 jun. 2013 12:08 schreef Emilio J. RodrÃguez-Posada emi...@gmail.com
het volgende:
Seriously, are we discussing again about bot stubs yes, bot stubs no?
Those users who want to submit complete 10-page articles, can move to the
defunct Nupedia or the
Hi!
Sad for seeing you so disappointed. Good to see you have insight
in butterflies. So I hope you will make your knowledge visible
on dewp, where neither genera so far have found its way into
articles. enwp (together with viwp!) has at least the genus
Jameela as an article.
That aside, is
As far as I know, that's even planned by the Wikidata team.
Cheers
Martin
2013/6/18 Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nl
Hello,
I am also unhappy with the mail from Hubertl, and also some remarks that
good be understood as a criticism of the German Wikipedia editing
community. Actually,
