On 8/2/12 7:51 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
And I would love to see
the foundation practice delegating some of this bureaucracy and
responsibility to non-staff groups. We have no shortage of energy, talent,
and experience there in the community.
In addition, there's a fairly well-organized set of
David Gerard wrote:
On 2 August 2012 05:13, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
This appears to be an unprecedented power-grab by the office of the General
Counsel.
Um ... that's a bizarre perception.
Is it?
I read through the page at Meta-Wiki and couldn't help but notice that every
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:45 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2012 05:13, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
This appears to be an unprecedented power-grab by the office of the
General
Counsel.
Um ... that's a bizarre perception.
Well, just look at the number of
Seriously stop hijacking this thread. Let MZMcBride have a chance at some
discussion on his question.
This below is just not cool. Have some respect for MZMcBride. He didn't write
out his thoughts or concerns with idea that the first reply would turn it all
into snip fodder. That seems beyond
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fwd: WMF Policy and Political Affiliations
Guideline
Geoff Brigham wrote:
Since the SOPA blackout, we have had a number of requests come in for
public affiliations regarding policy and political issues. The Wikimedia
Foundation (WMF) is not a political organization
