Erkan Yilmaz, 06/01/2015 19:02:
Wikiversity allows original research:
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Original_research
English Wikiversity, that is. (And French, perhaps others.) Italian
Wikiversity does not.
Castelo Branco, 09/01/2015 14:17:
Wikibooks is for textbooks, annotated texts, instructional guides, and
manuals.
(...) Wikibooks is not a place to publish primary research.
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:What_is_Wikibooks
That's only one language.
Nemo
Wikibooks is for textbooks, annotated texts, instructional guides, and
manuals.
(...) Wikibooks is not a place to publish primary research.
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks:What_is_Wikibooks
Michel Castelo Branco
2015-01-08 19:54 GMT-02:00 JP Béland lebo.bel...@gmail.com:
Wikibooks.
Depends how you write the original research, it can easily be considered a
textbook.
2015-01-09 6:17 GMT-07:00 Castelo Branco michelcastelobra...@gmail.com:
Wikibooks is for textbooks, annotated texts, instructional guides, and
manuals.
(...) Wikibooks is not a place to publish primary
Wikibooks.
2015-01-06 11:02 GMT-07:00 Castelo Branco michelcastelobra...@gmail.com:
+1 Ting Chen
Original research in a wiki way = Wikiversity
Original report (for recent events) and interviews = Wikinews
Regards,
Michel Castelo Branco
2015-01-05 12:07 GMT-02:00 Ting Chen
On 2015-01-05 14:56, Andrea Zanni wrote:
IMHO, this issue will get bigger and bigger over the years, and there
could
be room for another Wikimedia project that would allow open access,
collaborative peer review and editing of original research. It could be
a
sort of new environment between
+1 Ting Chen
Original research in a wiki way = Wikiversity
Original report (for recent events) and interviews = Wikinews
Regards,
Michel Castelo Branco
2015-01-05 12:07 GMT-02:00 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de:
Hello Sucheta,
for me this looks like a good restart for Wikiversity. For me
Wikiversity allows original research:
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Original_research
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Tim Davenport shoehu...@gmail.com wrote:
My suggestion to Sucheta would be to start a website dedicated to the
mission, to first publish there with appropriate
The Wikisource dogma is:
If things are published and free, they belong to Wikisource.
Unfortunately, there is no Wikimedia project for original research,
Sucheta.
As an example, some years ago I wanted to host my bachelor thesis (about
Wikisource) in a fixed form on Wikisource (and I could do
Sucheta Ghoshal, 05/01/2015 14:30:
huge repository
of texts, images, and other relevant details that they are willing to make
available digitally in the form of free contents.
Freely licensed reproductions of relevant primary sources are definitely
welcome on Wikimedia Commons.
We wish to
Hello Sucheta,
for me this looks like a good restart for Wikiversity. For me beside of
providing university courses one of the target of Wikiversity is also
always to be actually do crowd sourced research works.
Best regards
Ting
Am 01/05/2015 um 02:30 PM schrieb Sucheta Ghoshal:
Hi all,
This sounds like a Wikisource idea - do we have any wikisourcerers who can
give their thoughts?
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th
Wikisource should only be used for material that has already been published
elsewhere, it sounds like what's being attempted here is original
publishing.
One option may be simply to set up your own MediaWiki installation and host
such material there. You can therefore set your own licencing
13 matches
Mail list logo
