Trillium,
I am having difficulty understanding how retaining copies of possibly
forged identification documents helps anyone with holding accountable any
rogue functionary or OTRS user. Can you explain that please? Surely someone
who intends to misuse the tools will be smart enough to forge an
Trillium, while I sympathise with several of the points you're making, the
Board has approved the current version of the policy. In light of this,
your insinuation that the Executive Director could simply alter the policy
to her liking seems somewhat far-fetched. Just because staff have not yet
Okay, that's enough, Trilliium. You've now made a personal attack against
an identifiable individual based on gossip and rumour.
Stop.
Risker
On 29 June 2014 10:18, Trillium Corsage trillium2...@yandex.com wrote:
Pine,
An analogous argument to the one you're making is: someone who intends
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Trillium Corsage
trillium2...@yandex.com wrote:
(I dunno, Chinese military intelligence, with whom arbitrator Timotheus
Canens is said by some to be associated?)
Seriously?
I think you've gone on long enough for now. You can come off
moderation when you
Pine,
An analogous argument to the one you're making is: someone who intends to rob
your home will be able to get in one way or other, so why bother locking the
doors when you go out. This is not a good argument.
You're calling into question the reliability of every identification document
Hi Pajz,
The idea that a previously trustworthy functionary or OTRS volunteer might
later go rogue has occurred to me, so let's work with that example for a
moment.
Let's hypothesize that we have a good way (90% confidence) of verifying
all submitted identity documents and that those documents
On 06/29/2014 03:19 PM, Pine W wrote:
If you or someone else can suggest reasonable ways to reach 90% confidence
that identity documents are genuine and that identification information
will not be compromised while in transit or while at WMF, then I think it
makes sense to require
MMORPG players
:-(
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United
Trillium,
Let's be clear about a few things. The only data that checkusers get is a
subset of the data that the WMF webservers (and all other webservers
throughout the Internet) collect on all visitors. This is data that is
voluntarily disclosed by readers (although they may not all be aware of
Hi again Luis,
Thank you for commenting my open letter to Lila. I guess if I send an open
letter I should expect open responses, however I surely hope Lila will speak on
the matter, yea, nay, or not of concern to me, as I asked.
Yes, I recall your previous response to my previous email (which
@Nathan
You said so if you want to argue that such users should be positively
identified, then please make some practical suggestions (which you have
conspicuously avoided doing so far). How should identities be confirmed? In
what circumstances should the ID information be disclosed, and to
Hi, Trillium-
As I pointed out to you the last time we discussed the privacy
policy[1], this issue (and the rest of the policy) were discussed
extensively with the community, with the board, and with the previous
Executive Director. It was then approved by the Board.
This particular topic was
12 matches
Mail list logo
