As a fictional example, let's suppose some members of Congress propose
legislation to build a new Brooklyn Bridge. Under the subject: HR 999
Proposal to build a new Brooklyn Bridge, there would be one pro and one con
argument edited only by members of Congress and one pro and one con
As I understand it, part of the problem is that there are very strict rules
on what the WMF can do as part of lobbying in the US. Under Section
501(c)(3), nonprofits are not allowed to use a substantial part of their
spending on lobbying - meaning no more than 5% of the WMF's income can be
spent
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Carmen yarru...@charter.net wrote:
For example, in the encyclopedic Wikipedia, there's one article called
Brooklyn Bridge...
Actually, I've just considered this a bit longer (for my sins). It
occurs to me that perhaps you're not looking at big issues (like
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Carmen yarru...@charter.net wrote:
The WMF should stop pretending it's politically neutral (NPOV).
+1
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Carmen yarru...@charter.net wrote:
For example, in the encyclopedic Wikipedia, there's one article called
Brooklyn Bridge...
Actually, I've just considered this a bit longer (for my sins).
