Dear all To confirm, the Affiliations Committee did seek Wikimedia UK's perspective on the creation of *Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru*. Whilst the user group will be a separate entity to Wikimedia UK, and not a subsidiary as such, we are anticipating a lot of joint working and are currently developing a Memorandum of Understanding to clarify the relationship and to guide our work together. Robin Owain will continue to be employed full time
to develop and manage Wikimedia UK’s programme in Wales, working with external partners and the community to help deliver our strategy with a focus on Wales and the Welsh language. As part of this role he will work closely with the User Group as to support and develop the Wikimedia community in Wales, facilitating and delivering partnership events and activities and acting as the key contact point between the User Group and the Wikimedia UK Chapter. Of course, this is a new situation for us so we will continue to reflect on and review what's working, and any issues that arise, over the next year. Best wishes Lucy On 20 March 2018 at 16:13, <wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote: > Send Wikimedia-l mailing list submissions to > wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > wikimedia-l-ow...@lists.wikimedia.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Wikimedia-l digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru > (Kirill Lokshin) > 2. Re: Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru (Fæ) > 3. Re: Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru > (Kirill Lokshin) > 4. Re: Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru (Fæ) > 5. Re: Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru > (Jean-Philippe Béland) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:03:53 -0600 > From: Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned > Wicimedia Cymru > Message-ID: > <CAA8pnFPGOucqKrmdmGg01yG7A3nK5CQPMzSM71O3ORkMHfxPSg@mail. > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Descriptions of user group activities on Meta shouldn't be interpreted as > legal documents under UK law (or any other legal code, for that matter). > > Any questions regarding potential legal implications for Wikimedia UK > should, of course, be directed to the chapter itself. > > Regards, > Kirill Lokshin > Chair, Affiliations Committee > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Support the request that AffCom share their understanding of the scope > > and authority of the announced User Group. > > > > From the wording of "represent Wikimedia UK in Wales"[1], the UG is > > not independent of WMUK and consequently acts as a Chapter subsidiary. > > As far as I am aware, there is no other regional based UG which does > > this. > > > > As a corollary, the representation has legal implications for UK > > Charity. WMUK must have both responsibility and the authority to > > monitor and control how they are represented by the UG. It is not > > clear from the meta web page or the community vote how this will work, > > apart from the implicit assumption that funding paid to UG projects is > > effectively managed as a WMUK continuing programme. Presumably the UG > > will not be requesting funds from the WMF or via the FDC process > > separate from WMUK's FDC procedure. > > > > The original vote at the Welsh Wikipedia compared the aims to that of > > the Basque UG.[2] However based on their scope, the Basque UG does not > > officially represent any other affiliate or Chapter. > > > > Links > > 1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_User_Group_Wales > > 2. https://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicipedia:Sefydlu_Gr%C5%B5p_ > > Defnyddwyr_Wicimedia > > > > On 19 March 2018 at 00:10, Philip Kopetzky <philip.kopet...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi Kirill! > > > > > > It would be really helpful to outline these kind of decisions with > > > arguments/deliberations that AffCom decided to follow, considering that > > > this sets a precedence in the worldwide community. For example, UG > Wales > > > states that they "cooperate with and represent Wikimedia UK in Wales" - > > > does this mean that we are now accepting UGs within chapters? Is this > UG > > > supposed to be able to apply for grants, despite its overlap with WMUK? > > > > > > Best, > > > Philip > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11 March 2018 at 15:44, Shlomi Fish <shlo...@shlomifish.org> wrote: > > > > > >> On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 10:32:34 -0400 > > >> Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi everyone! > > >> > > > >> > I'm very happy to announce that the Affiliations Committee has > > recognized > > >> > Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru (Wikimedia Community User > > Group > > >> > Wales) [1] as a Wikimedia User Group. The group aims to promote the > > >> > Wikimedia movement in Wales and support the development of Wikimedia > > >> > projects and content in the Welsh language. > > >> > > > >> > Please join me in congratulating the members of this new user group! > > >> > > > >> > > >> congratulations! > > >> > > >> > Regards, > > >> > Kirill Lokshin > > >> > Chair, Affiliations Committee > > >> > > > >> > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_User_ > > Group_Wales > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > >> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > >> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: > > >> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: > > >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > >> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject= > unsubscribe> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ > > >> My Favourite FOSS - http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/favourite/ > > >> > > > > -- > > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:29:15 +0000 > From: Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned > Wicimedia Cymru > Message-ID: > <CAH7nnD3hho-vN-XFmvCwFNS2yWRc2_fc7DMTyK44icuPCfPN-g@mail. > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > On 20 March 2018 at 15:03, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Descriptions of user group activities on Meta shouldn't be interpreted as > > legal documents under UK law (or any other legal code, for that matter). > > Hi Kirill, > > In the spirit of an open and transparent process, could you please > provide a link to the scope of the new approved User Group is > published, as the one on Meta is not the one that AffCom reviewed with > the UG application? > > > Any questions regarding potential legal implications for Wikimedia UK > > should, of course, be directed to the chapter itself. > > This brush-off is surprising, with the clear implication that AffCom > has not approached WMUK with any question. I was mistaken in believing > that AffCom had a responsibility to consider obvious legal > implications, before approving a User Group that is granted the right > to use official logos and the name "Wikipedia" and its language > variants when advertising their events. It is disappointing to see > that AffCom does not see their official process as needing to address > these areas, which may well be a barrier to direct funding, legal > recognition or represent a risk to other named pre-existing Affiliates > within the scope of the proposed new UG. > > > Regards, > > Kirill Lokshin > > Chair, Affiliations Committee > > Thanks, > Fae, volunteer > -- > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Support the request that AffCom share their understanding of the scope > >> and authority of the announced User Group. > >> > >> From the wording of "represent Wikimedia UK in Wales"[1], the UG is > >> not independent of WMUK and consequently acts as a Chapter subsidiary. > >> As far as I am aware, there is no other regional based UG which does > >> this. > >> > >> As a corollary, the representation has legal implications for UK > >> Charity. WMUK must have both responsibility and the authority to > >> monitor and control how they are represented by the UG. It is not > >> clear from the meta web page or the community vote how this will work, > >> apart from the implicit assumption that funding paid to UG projects is > >> effectively managed as a WMUK continuing programme. Presumably the UG > >> will not be requesting funds from the WMF or via the FDC process > >> separate from WMUK's FDC procedure. > >> > >> The original vote at the Welsh Wikipedia compared the aims to that of > >> the Basque UG.[2] However based on their scope, the Basque UG does not > >> officially represent any other affiliate or Chapter. > >> > >> Links > >> 1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_User_Group_Wales > >> 2. https://cy.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicipedia:Sefydlu_Gr%C5%B5p_ > >> Defnyddwyr_Wicimedia > >> > >> On 19 March 2018 at 00:10, Philip Kopetzky <philip.kopet...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Kirill! > >> > > >> > It would be really helpful to outline these kind of decisions with > >> > arguments/deliberations that AffCom decided to follow, considering > that > >> > this sets a precedence in the worldwide community. For example, UG > Wales > >> > states that they "cooperate with and represent Wikimedia UK in Wales" > - > >> > does this mean that we are now accepting UGs within chapters? Is this > UG > >> > supposed to be able to apply for grants, despite its overlap with > WMUK? > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Philip > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 11 March 2018 at 15:44, Shlomi Fish <shlo...@shlomifish.org> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 10:32:34 -0400 > >> >> Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Hi everyone! > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm very happy to announce that the Affiliations Committee has > >> recognized > >> >> > Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned Wicimedia Cymru (Wikimedia Community User > >> Group > >> >> > Wales) [1] as a Wikimedia User Group. The group aims to promote the > >> >> > Wikimedia movement in Wales and support the development of > Wikimedia > >> >> > projects and content in the Welsh language. > >> >> > > >> >> > Please join me in congratulating the members of this new user > group! > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> congratulations! > >> >> > >> >> > Regards, > >> >> > Kirill Lokshin > >> >> > Chair, Affiliations Committee > >> >> > > >> >> > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_User_ > >> Group_Wales > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > >> >> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > >> >> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: > >> >> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: > >> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > >> >> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject= > unsubscribe> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ > >> >> My Favourite FOSS - http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/favourite/ > >> >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:36:46 -0600 > From: Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned > Wicimedia Cymru > Message-ID: > <CAA8pnFNi-q5fFi-kHpONiYScXn=a5nnFB2Hs7TJO0HYsnu1aNw@mail. > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 20 March 2018 at 15:03, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Descriptions of user group activities on Meta shouldn't be interpreted > as > > > legal documents under UK law (or any other legal code, for that > matter). > > > > Hi Kirill, > > > > In the spirit of an open and transparent process, could you please > > provide a link to the scope of the new approved User Group is > > published, as the one on Meta is not the one that AffCom reviewed with > > the UG application? > > > > The Affiliations Committee publishes all of our application review and > approval resolutions on Meta; the one for the group in question can be > found at > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/ > Resolutions/Recognition_Grŵp_Defnyddwyr_Cymuned_Wicimedia_Cymru > . > > > > > Any questions regarding potential legal implications for Wikimedia UK > > > should, of course, be directed to the chapter itself. > > > > This brush-off is surprising, with the clear implication that AffCom > > has not approached WMUK with any question. I was mistaken in believing > > that AffCom had a responsibility to consider obvious legal > > implications, before approving a User Group that is granted the right > > to use official logos and the name "Wikipedia" and its language > > variants when advertising their events. It is disappointing to see > > that AffCom does not see their official process as needing to address > > these areas, which may well be a barrier to direct funding, legal > > recognition or represent a risk to other named pre-existing Affiliates > > within the scope of the proposed new UG. > > > > Your implication is entirely incorrect; AffCom consulted with -- and > received an endorsement from -- Wikimedia UK prior to approving the user > group. However, we are neither experts in UK charity law nor empowered to > speak on behalf of Wikimedia UK; consequently, any questions regarding the > chapter's legal position should be posed to the chapter, not to us. > > Regards, > Kirill Lokshin > Chair, Affiliations Committee > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:09:21 +0000 > From: Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned > Wicimedia Cymru > Message-ID: > <CAH7nnD2x83ShSe0drumGRyThohcRZY3A-Z_atiBLdP7rvTwvFQ@mail. > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > On 20 March 2018 at 15:36, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 20 March 2018 at 15:03, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Descriptions of user group activities on Meta shouldn't be > interpreted as > >> > legal documents under UK law (or any other legal code, for that > matter). > >> > >> Hi Kirill, > >> > >> In the spirit of an open and transparent process, could you please > >> provide a link to the scope of the new approved User Group is > >> published, as the one on Meta is not the one that AffCom reviewed with > >> the UG application? > >> > > > > The Affiliations Committee publishes all of our application review and > > approval resolutions on Meta; the one for the group in question can be > > found at > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/ > Resolutions/Recognition_Grŵp_Defnyddwyr_Cymuned_Wicimedia_Cymru > > Thanks for the link, that's great. It would be super to include a link > to the relevant resolution when making announcements. > > Unfortunately your emails seem in conflict with the resolution. The > statement by the Affiliations Committee links to the meta page to > define the reviewed scope, the words used are "The scope of the group, > which can be found on their meta page" and then gives a link to the > same page I used previously and read that the User Group represents > WMUK. In fact there are no other links to any other document that can > be interpreted as "officially" publishing the scope of the new user > group. > > Consequently there is no ambiguity that the AffCom approval was > literally for a regional User Group with a stated objective to > represent the national Chapter. The exact words are "Cooperate with > and represent Wikimedia UK in Wales". > > It is worth noting that the italicized sentence in the very brief > summary appears to be intended to be a direct quote from the meta > page, however it is a rephrasing which turns the sentence into an > objective for the new User Group when the phrasing on the original > page is a description of members (i.e. not the group itself). It is > not stated whether the interpreted objective was part of the UG > application, or someone else's interpretation of the published scope. > This seems misleading unless the meta page is rephrased to include the > statement of scope as explicitly that. This may seem a fine point, but > there exact words that officially define a new Affiliate or User Group > seem worth getting precise so everyone understands what has been > authorized. > > Thanks, > Fae > > > > > > >> > Any questions regarding potential legal implications for Wikimedia UK > >> > should, of course, be directed to the chapter itself. > >> > >> This brush-off is surprising, with the clear implication that AffCom > >> has not approached WMUK with any question. I was mistaken in believing > >> that AffCom had a responsibility to consider obvious legal > >> implications, before approving a User Group that is granted the right > >> to use official logos and the name "Wikipedia" and its language > >> variants when advertising their events. It is disappointing to see > >> that AffCom does not see their official process as needing to address > >> these areas, which may well be a barrier to direct funding, legal > >> recognition or represent a risk to other named pre-existing Affiliates > >> within the scope of the proposed new UG. > >> > > > > Your implication is entirely incorrect; AffCom consulted with -- and > > received an endorsement from -- Wikimedia UK prior to approving the user > > group. However, we are neither experts in UK charity law nor empowered > to > > speak on behalf of Wikimedia UK; consequently, any questions regarding > the > > chapter's legal position should be posed to the chapter, not to us. > > For the sake of openness and transparency, can you provide a link to > where the endorsement and any questions raised are published? It is > not included with the AffCom resolution. > > > Regards, > > Kirill Lokshin > > Chair, Affiliations Committee > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > -- > fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:12:54 +0000 > From: Jean-Philippe Béland <jpbel...@wikimedia.ca> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Recognition of Grŵp Defnyddwyr Cymuned > Wicimedia Cymru > Message-ID: > <CADD2uPgOssSOYfX6ZfgFRCsEz4UFv38Jc9i=kNV1cA-dj0oQoQ@mail. > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > I agree with Kirill, from the WMF point of view, as long as the chapter is > informed and endorsed the creation of a user group within its covered > territory, the WMF did its due diligence. After that, it is the > responsibility of the chapter to do its homework about the local legal > framework before endorsing the creation of the user group. > > That being said, I would also be interested in hearing from Wikimedia UK's > perspective on this new user group and the reasoning behind it. > > Jean-Philippe Béland > Vice President, Wikimedia Canada > Coordinator, Wikimedians of North American Indigenous Languages User Group > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:37 AM Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 20 March 2018 at 15:03, Kirill Lokshin <kirill.loks...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Descriptions of user group activities on Meta shouldn't be > interpreted > > as > > > > legal documents under UK law (or any other legal code, for that > > matter). > > > > > > Hi Kirill, > > > > > > In the spirit of an open and transparent process, could you please > > > provide a link to the scope of the new approved User Group is > > > published, as the one on Meta is not the one that AffCom reviewed with > > > the UG application? > > > > > > > The Affiliations Committee publishes all of our application review and > > approval resolutions on Meta; the one for the group in question can be > > found at > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/ > Resolutions/Recognition_Grŵp_Defnyddwyr_Cymuned_Wicimedia_Cymru > > . > > > > > > > > Any questions regarding potential legal implications for Wikimedia UK > > > > should, of course, be directed to the chapter itself. > > > > > > This brush-off is surprising, with the clear implication that AffCom > > > has not approached WMUK with any question. I was mistaken in believing > > > that AffCom had a responsibility to consider obvious legal > > > implications, before approving a User Group that is granted the right > > > to use official logos and the name "Wikipedia" and its language > > > variants when advertising their events. It is disappointing to see > > > that AffCom does not see their official process as needing to address > > > these areas, which may well be a barrier to direct funding, legal > > > recognition or represent a risk to other named pre-existing Affiliates > > > within the scope of the proposed new UG. > > > > > > > Your implication is entirely incorrect; AffCom consulted with -- and > > received an endorsement from -- Wikimedia UK prior to approving the user > > group. However, we are neither experts in UK charity law nor empowered > to > > speak on behalf of Wikimedia UK; consequently, any questions regarding > the > > chapter's legal position should be posed to the chapter, not to us. > > > > Regards, > > Kirill Lokshin > > Chair, Affiliations Committee > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > ------------------------------ > > End of Wikimedia-l Digest, Vol 168, Issue 37 > ******************************************** > -- Lucy Crompton-Reid Chief Executive Wikimedia UK +44 (0) 203 372 0762 *Wikimedia UK* is the national chapter for the global Wikimedia open knowledge movement, and a registered charity. We rely on donations from individuals to support our work to make knowledge open for all. Have you considered supporting Wikimedia? https://donate.wikimedia.org.uk Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 6741827 Registered Charity No.1144513 Registered Office Ground Floor, Europoint, 5 - 11 Lavington Street, London SE1 0NZ The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
