Re: [Wikimedia-l] dmoz.org

Okay we will simple need to change the DMOZ template to point to archive.org I guess. J On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On 12 March 2017 at 08:03, carl hansen wrote: > > > I see dmoz.org is going offline in few days

Re: [Wikimedia-l] dmoz.org

On 12 March 2017 at 08:03, carl hansen wrote: > I see dmoz.org is going offline in few days after a couple decades. It is a > community-written project. Will it be absorbed into wikidata? Sort of a > snapshot-in-time of the web. Archive.org has it:

Re: [Wikimedia-l] dmoz.org

It might be as well to understand why ODP folded and whether there is likely to be volunteer effort available for its continuation before spending time effort and money on reconstituting it as a WMF project. "Rogol" On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 2:56 PM, James Heilman wrote: > IMO

Re: [Wikimedia-l] dmoz.org

IMO this is something we should absorb into the WMF family of sites. Should not be too hard to format as a wiki. Not sure how big their community is. Anyone have any idea? James On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 8:54 AM, James Heilman wrote: > Gah really :-( DMOZ was super useful for

Re: [Wikimedia-l] dmoz.org

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > Hoi, > It is not going to be absorbed in Wikidata. We did not even do that for > Freebase to my regret. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 12 March 2017 at 09:03, carl hansen wrote: >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] dmoz.org

I wonder if there's a lesson for other knowledge projects here ... "Rogol" On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 8:03 AM, carl hansen wrote: > I see dmoz.org is going offline in few days after a couple decades. It is > a > community-written project. Will it be absorbed into

Re: [Wikimedia-l] dmoz.org

Hoi, It is not going to be absorbed in Wikidata. We did not even do that for Freebase to my regret. Thanks, GerardM On 12 March 2017 at 09:03, carl hansen wrote: > I see dmoz.org is going offline in few days after a couple decades. It is > a > community-written