Re: [WM-RU] Fwd: [WMCEE-l] European Science Photo Competition 2015 [must read!]

2015-10-18 Пенетрантность Дмитрий

Привествую, коллеги!
По существу:
А) Нужно создать локальное жюри, хотя бы 3 человека, немного
разбирающиеся в научности и фотографиях.
Б) Призовой вопрос -  спонсора  нет, похоже ВМ.РУ
предстоит выделить по 4 000 рублей на каждого из победителя в 5-ти
номинациях. 20 000 рублей сумма не критичная. Ну, или до 30 октября нужно
найти спонсора.
В) ЭТО САМОЕ ВЫЖНО. Нужно создать большую красную кнопку "нажмите
здесь, чтобы загрузить    фотографии" на странице конкурса. А так же разместить 
линк на загрузку на коммонс (в шаблоне загрузки необходимо добавить возможность 
выбора загружающим конкретной номинации конкурса, как это сделано у украинских 
коллег:  
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard?campaign=espc-ua ).
Основная страница конкурса будет на ВМ.РУ и уже создана  
https://ru.wikimedia.org/wiki/Европейский_конкурс_научных_фотографий_2015 
Доработки страницы только приветствуются.   Можно сделать анонс на главной 
странице наше
Вики.
Г)На коммонс страница конкурса готова на 90% - оставшееся
дело времени. 


>Воскресенье, 18 октября 2015, 13:07 +03:00 от Stanislav Kozlovskiy 
>:
>
>
>-- Forwarded message --
>From:  Ivo Kruusamägi < ivo.kruusam...@gmail.com >
>Date: 2015-10-16 3:42 GMT+03:00
>Subject: [WMCEE-l] European Science Photo Competition 2015 [must read!]
>To: A list for Wikimedians from Central and Eastern Europe < 
>wmce...@tools.wikimedia.pl >
>
>
>Hi everyone!
>
>Some Q round about soon to come  European Science Photo Comp .
>
>1) Are you still looking for local teams? Yes we are!
>Someone should carry out the sub-competitions and organize sufficient 
>promotion. You can all ask around on if your country has a person (or more) 
>for this. Or step up yourself. Minimum goal is just to set up a local jury who 
>would take care of the image selection process.
>
>2) May we skip this year? No way that's gonna happen.
>There isn't any good reason to repeat this competition next year. What's the 
>point of even setting up prizes if there would be two half-held competitions? 
>Better to have one and do it big. This isn't WLM. The rate of new good images 
>emerging yearly in this field also isn't that high. So: everyone will 
>participate. Only difference is if you will participate actively or in a 
>default mode. 
>
>3) Is there a time to do promotion? Yes there is.
>We are mainly aiming for images that are already there. That's why there isn't 
>even a need to start the promotion before November (but it clearly doesn't do 
>harm to start early). We want people to upload what they have and encourage 
>them to take more images in the future.
>
>4) But we don't have money /time to ask stuff from WMF? Well, you don't need 
>to.
>It's a competition. Sponsors should be the ones paying for this stuff and not 
>you. If you haven't learned that out by now, then this is the chance. There 
>are plenty of organizations and companies who are willing to give prizes 
>and/or money. Just go and ask.
>
>5) What information is needed about local competition?
>Local competition subpages should be set up with the information about who are 
>the local jury members, what (special) prizes will be given out and who to 
>contact with problems or information. Rest of the information is already 
>present in the international competition page. NB! Don't forget to add the big 
>red button named "Press here to upload your photos".
>
>6) How should we set up the jury?
>I'd recommend to include at least  one professional photographer, a science 
>journalist, a wikipedian who is competent in photo related stuff and some 
>scientists in from different fields who know a bit about photography.
>It isn't going to be problem if some images presented to the competition will 
>be from topics unknown to jury members. Description should be the thing that 
>makes it clear how special it is or isn't and jury still needs to find images 
>that are visually stunning and have some wow-effect related to them (this is a 
>photo competition you know!). It is just the same in nature photo competition: 
>no-one cares on how difficult it was to make that image (only the author knows 
>that anyway). Question is about what story this image has for the audience.
>
>7) What is the expected outcome of the competition?
>I would expect the total number of submission somewhere around 30k (but the 
>numbers per country would of course differ substantially and the end number 
>would be greatly dependent on what counties would have local 
>organization/promotion groups and which ones would not).
>This is an excellent event to get some media attention, so please use it! I'd 
>also expect that this would help to set up some cooperation with local 
>organizations, get some good contacts with companies who are willing to 
>sponsor Wikipedia-related activities and speed up some university cooperation.
>
>As a conclusion. We are perfectly positioned to carry out huge low cost 
>photographic events. European Science 

Re: [WM-RU] Fwd: [WMCEE-l] European Science Photo Competition 2015 [must read!]

2015-10-18 Пенетрантность Nikolai Litvinov
Добрый вечер, уважаемый Дмитрий!


Как уже говорил:
1) Спонсора найти: а спонсорский пакет готов? - присылайте, попробую.
2) Жюри - из журнала "Популярная Механика" и номинаторам годовая подписка!
А победителям - публикация фотографии в журнале (если да - начинаю
согласования)!
3) Новость о старте конкурса - нужно на сайте ПМ. Попробую на сайте ФАНО
(РАН).
4) Нужно все институты РАН проинформировать - подскажите, как это
сделать... Есть идея - модный научный журнал "Кот Шрёдингера"! Там люди из
журнала Эксперт. Нужно подготовить формы письма в ПМ и в Кот. Еще "Наука и
жизнь", "Химия и жизнь", "Знание - сила", газеты "Поиск" и др. То есть PR в
СМИ нужен обязательно - это привлекательные условия для спонсора.

Спонсор - производители эталонов и микроскопов подойдет? Но там же не
только "нано". А резиденты "Сколково"? Могу узнать. Но время...

Это пока мозговой штурм. Простите, если сбивчиво.


С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Николай Литвинов, к.э.н.
+7(916)6053226



On 19 October 2015 at 00:51, Дмитрий  wrote:

> Привествую, коллеги!
>
> По существу:
>
> А) Нужно создать локальное жюри, хотя бы 3 человека, немного разбирающиеся
> в научности и фотографиях.
>
> Б) Призовой вопрос -  спонсора  нет, похоже ВМ.РУ предстоит выделить по 4
> 000 рублей на каждого из победителя в 5-ти номинациях. 20 000 рублей сумма
> не критичная. Ну, или до 30 октября нужно найти спонсора.
>
> В) ЭТО САМОЕ ВЫЖНО. Нужно создать большую красную кнопку "нажмите здесь,
> чтобы загрузить  фотографии" на странице конкурса. А так же разместить
> линк на загрузку на коммонс (в шаблоне загрузки необходимо добавить
> возможность выбора загружающим конкретной номинации конкурса, как это
> сделано у украинских коллег:
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard?campaign=espc-ua
> ).
>
> Основная страница конкурса будет на ВМ.РУ и уже создана
> https://ru.wikimedia.org/wiki/Европейский_конкурс_научных_фотографий_2015
> Доработки страницы только приветствуются.   Можно сделать анонс на главной
> странице наше Вики.
>
> Г)На коммонс страница конкурса готова на 90% - оставшееся дело времени.
>
>
>
> Воскресенье, 18 октября 2015, 13:07 +03:00 от Stanislav Kozlovskiy <
> s...@wikimedia.ru>:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: *Ivo Kruusamägi*  >
> Date: 2015-10-16 3:42 GMT+03:00
> Subject: [WMCEE-l] European Science Photo Competition 2015 [must read!]
> To: A list for Wikimedians from Central and Eastern Europe <
> wmce...@tools.wikimedia.pl
> >
>
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> Some Q round about soon to come European Science Photo Comp
> 
> .
>
> *1) Are you still looking for local teams? Yes we are!*
> Someone should carry out the sub-competitions and organize sufficient
> promotion. You can all ask around on if your country has a person (or more)
> for this. Or step up yourself. Minimum goal is just to set up a local jury
> who would take care of the image selection process.
>
> *2) May we skip this year? No way that's gonna happen.*
> There isn't any good reason to repeat this competition next year. What's
> the point of even setting up prizes if there would be two half-held
> competitions? Better to have one and do it big. This isn't WLM. The rate of
> new good images emerging yearly in this field also isn't that high. So:
> everyone will participate. Only difference is if you will participate
> actively or in a default mode.
>
> *3) Is there a time to do promotion? Yes there is.*
> We are mainly aiming for images that are already there. That's why there
> isn't even a need to start the promotion before November (but it clearly
> doesn't do harm to start early). We want people to upload what they have
> and encourage them to take more images in the future.
>
> *4) But we don't have money /time to ask stuff from WMF? Well, you don't
> need to.*
> It's a competition. Sponsors should be the ones paying for this stuff and
> not you. If you haven't learned that out by now, then this is the chance.
> There are plenty of organizations and companies who are willing to give
> prizes and/or money. Just go and ask.
>
> *5) What information is needed about local competition?*
> Local competition subpages should be set up with the information about who
> are the local jury members, what (special) prizes will be given out and who
> to contact with problems or information. Rest of the information is already
> present in the international competition page. NB! Don't forget to add the
> big red button named "Press here to upload your photos".
>
> *6) How should we set up the jury?*
> I'd recommend to include at least one professional photographer, a
> science journalist, a wikipedian who is competent in photo related stuff
> and some scientists in from different fields who know