So it's a comparison of two search systems, neither of which we use? On 25 August 2015 at 10:54, Tilman Bayer <tba...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > FYI just in case it's of interest and hasn't shown up on the team's radar yet: > http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7194368 - > paywalled, unfortunately. > > Quote from the abstract: > > "This paper discusses expressivity and accuracy of the By-Example > Structured (BESt) Query paradigm implemented on the SWiPE system > through the Wikipedia interface. We define an experimental setting > based on the natural language questions made available by the QALD-4 > challenge, in which we compare SWiPE against Xser, a state-of-the-art > Question Answering system, and plain keyword search provided by the > Wikipedia Search Engine. The experiments show that SWiPE outperforms > the results provided by Wikipedia, and it also performs sensibly > better than Xser, obtaining an overall 85% of totally correct answers > vs. 68% of Xser." > > (For context, there's an earlier paper where they describe an earlier > version of that SWiPE - "Search Wikipedia by example" - project: > http://web.cs.ucla.edu/~zaniolo/papers/AtzoriZ12 ) > -- > Tilman Bayer > Senior Analyst > Wikimedia Foundation > IRC (Freenode): HaeB > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-search mailing list > Wikimedia-search@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search
-- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-search mailing list Wikimedia-search@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search
