Thanks, Neal. That's well-said, and definitely points that need making.
On 06/07/2020 18:24, Neal McBurnett wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, Pharos. I've signed the open letter on behalf of the
Wikimedians of Colorado User Group.
Thanks for the reminder, Pharos. I've signed the open letter on behalf of the
Wikimedians of Colorado User Group.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_open_letter_on_renaming
I previously filled out my own opinions via the survey sent out earlier, with
the comments below.
If you like, I
Great if you can decide everything before July 7, when the brand survey
ends.
You should also have received a separate affiliate brand survey email from
the WMF people.
Thanks,
Richard
(User:Pharos)
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:19 PM Neal McBurnett
wrote:
> We have three yesses so far. I suggest
We have three yesses so far. I suggest we wait another day or two then submit a
group response if we have consensus.
-Neal
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 10:05:58PM +, Isarra Yos wrote:
> Seems reasonable to me.
>
> We should probably get our group back in compliance, though, while we're at
> it
Seems reasonable to me.
We should probably get our group back in compliance, though, while we're
at it - I think all we need to do is actually submit our report
(https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Colorado_User_Group/Annual_Report_2019).
Should I just go ahead and do that?
-I
It is exactly correct and I have signed it as well.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 10:12 PM Neal McBurnett
wrote:
> See the attachment for an open letter organized by dozens of Wikimedia
> affiliates asking for an immediate pause to renaming activities by the
> Wikimedia Foundation, due to process
See the attachment for an open letter organized by dozens of Wikimedia
affiliates asking for an immediate pause to renaming activities by the
Wikimedia Foundation, due to process shortcomings of the 2030 Movement Brand
Project.
I just signed the open letter described in the attachment.
Or
