But the formula used is flawed as it looks only at 100% reverts of edits,
gives weight to those which occur multiple times so what its identifies is
not necessarily the most controversial but the most vandalised articles
On 9 June 2013 06:42, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 08
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 08:06:17AM +1000, Kerry Raymond wrote:
> There has been an Hungarian research project into identifying controversial
> articles in Wikipedia, based on the history of reversions and edit wars.
> They have a website:
>
> http://wwm.phy.bme.hu/
>
> with their datasets, progra
