Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Hartwig Thomas
The credit is not wrong, but possibly somewhat incomplete. As you well know, much of the content of Wikimedia has more than one author and it is common knowledge that all of the content of Wikimedia is published as CC-BY-SA or GFDL. In the case of many authors attribution is often difficult.

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Hartwig Thomas
To cite another example: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rencontres_Wikimedia_France_-_Intervention_de_Ludovic_P%C3%A9ron.JPG states clearly, that the license is CC-BY-SA, but – very unfortunately indeed – it does not unambiguously attribute the authorship!! Or does “user” mean

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Ludovic Péron
PM To: Wikimedians in Switzerland Subject: Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject) On 16/10/13 13:27, Hartwig Thomas wrote: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rencontres_Wikimedia_France_-_Intervention_de_Ludovic_P%C3%A9ron.JPG states clearly, that the license is CC-BY-SA, but – very

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Ludovic Péron
** ** *From:* wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *Ludovic Péron *Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:35 PM *To:* Wikimedians in Switzerland *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject) ** ** Hi Thomas, ** ** Just

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Hartwig Thomas
...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Ludovic Péron Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:35 PM To: Wikimedians in Switzerland Subject: Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject) Hi Thomas, Just one point, for other I think other people could ask. You say Please embed licensing information

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Frédéric Schütz
...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimediach-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Schütz Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:31 PM To: Wikimedians in Switzerland Subject: Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject) On 16/10/13 13:27, Hartwig Thomas wrote: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Ludovic Péron
:* Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:35 PM *To:* Wikimedians in Switzerland *Subject:* Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject) ** ** Hi Thomas, ** ** Just one point, for other I think other people could ask. ** ** You say Please embed licensing information in the metadata

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Hartwig Thomas
: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:45 PM To: Wikimedians in Switzerland Subject: Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject) No. If i save the picture on my computer, I don't see these EXIF. 2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch In that case, there is nothing to worry about! The picture

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Fanny Schertzer
2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch The credit is not wrong, but possibly somewhat incomplete. It's not incomplete, it's non existent. It names the repository instead of the source, the author is not mentioned, let's not even talk about the license (which, I admit, is the

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Hartwig Thomas
in Switzerland Subject: Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject) Thomas, The reprostation on this picture is the first one of this project. So the creator of this reprostation is not Burno, it's me. Ludovic 2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch Did you notice, that the scanning

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Hartwig Thomas
in Switzerland Subject: Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject) 2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch The credit is not wrong, but possibly somewhat incomplete. It's not incomplete, it's non existent. It names the repository instead of the source, the author is not mentioned, let's

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Fanny Schertzer
2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch Did you notice, that the scanning station on the picture was invented and built by Bruno with his own mind and hands and made available to Wikipedia for free? Did Charles Andrès ask his permission to publish a photograph of it? Did he

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Frédéric Schütz
On 16/10/13 13:47, Hartwig Thomas wrote: Did you notice, that the scanning station on the picture was invented and built by Bruno with his own mind and hands and made available to Wikipedia for free? Did Charles Andrès ask his permission to publish a photograph of it? Did he attribute its

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Fanny Schertzer
2013/10/16 Hartwig Thomas hartwig.tho...@enterag.ch I have had my cup of tea. I still consider people despicable who do not recognize, that someone has spent weeks and weeks for no money whatsoever to further the common good. A nice private notice or question to Bruno would have been

Re: [Wikimediach-l] (no subject)

2013-10-16 Diskussionsfäden Ludovic Péron
Thomas, Please, see the medata of the filehttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbarium_Neuch%C3%A2tel,_Ludovic_P%C3%A9ron_num%C3%A9risant_des_planches.jpg, look the date of the picture : 29 June 2012 WMCH bought the Bruno's reprostation in december 2012 So, it's really complected to