Hi all,
I am mayur a hindi wikipedian.I have prepared a survey to determine
overall quality of a wikipedia project.Here is the link
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IFphBpq14eMUjoBcy0wk-WWQNTQ5vxpq_o285DyrqvU/edit?hl=en
for
survey report. Here is the Summary for that
*Why did we do
Mayur might have forgot to set the privacy setting of the document to *
Public*.
Hope he will change the privacy settings soon.
Shiju
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.comwrote:
Hoi,
I wanted to have a look but I learned that I need permission. You can
Hi, i observed that the link i provided had not a quality pdf inside it, plz
update the link as
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=explorerchrome=truesrcid=0B4gKWd59QgsSZDI5MDI0MGEtNDBkNC00OWNlLTlhOTMtYWUxOGMwMWY1Zjhmhl=en
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Gerard Meijssen
Hi Mayur,
Interesting analysis. Thanks for the hard work.
Is there any academic reference based on which the formula was arrived or is
it empirical?
One possible indicator for a Wikipedia's quality may be offline activisim /
organizing as it indicates the community's rapport which is very vital
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:18 PM, mayur mayur...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I choose many important factors that was available in wikimedia stats,
The formula was derived by me but as a past student of economics i tried to
do my best, basically i marked each factor on the scale of 100 so that no
Mayur, This is really great work!
This should be an Inspiration to improve on the weak areas of each
wikipedia.
regards
Ramesh NG
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:58 PM, mayur mayur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am mayur a hindi wikipedian.I have prepared a survey to
determine overall
