WDD, If you look thru your mail to a month back, you'll find a link I
had sent called Why Wikipedia needs marketers. This would be useful.
Also the Bell Pottinger issue and Jimmy Wales' reply to the issue. All
of them are in the mailing list December 2011 archives.
--
Regards,
Srikanth
Controversial perhaps- but I think it's pretty important they learn the
principles here.
I am aware of quite a few PR and SMM agencies that edit Wikipedia and they
are generally quite unaware about the principles- and end up being a bigger
burden than they would otherwise have been had they known
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 17:11, Aditya Sengupta apsengu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have three suggestions for inclusion here, based on recent experiences:
copyrights/copyvio, notability; and some emphasis on verifiability.
CoI is much much more important in this context.
--
Regards
Srikanth.L
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 17:15, Srikanth Lakshmanan srik@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 17:11, Aditya Sengupta apsengu...@gmail.comwrote:
I have three suggestions for inclusion here, based on recent experiences:
copyrights/copyvio, notability; and some emphasis on verifiability.
Hi,
This is to inform you that Moksh and I have been invited to conduct a
one hour workshop this Friday, 6 January 2012 at Text100, a PR firm (who were
media
partners at WCI 2011). This will be at their Mumbai office and will be
relayed live to all their offices across India and possibly
hi,
The editing of Wikipedia by PR and social media agencies has been
controversial. It might raise eyebrows that you're going to inform
them how to edit Wikipedia. However, they will learn to edit even
without Wikipedian help. I think it is better to engage than to shy
away.
Also, suggest that
