Seems worthwhile to do both these - the most accurate bits in all the recent
reports are from the Foundation's press release, which I forwarded them
after the Sunday meet.
Bishakha
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Ravishankar wrote:
> Srikanth,
>
> 1. Whether they take or not, this will be a pro
read 'an external body' instead of media in my previous email. I guess we
have enough 'good experience' with non media communication as well.
Regards,
Jyothis.
http://www.Jyothis.net
http://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jyothis
I am the first customer of http://www.netdotnet.com
woods are lovely d
Ravi,
Good points. I agree that it is better to provide a prepared release.
Whether they want it or not is not our issue.
Further to point 3, it would be better if the media channel is limited to
the designated people. Rest of the folks could just redirect all queries to
them and let the designat
Srikanth,
1. Whether they take or not, this will be a professional way for us to do.
This will also be a good way to document our activities.
2. And if they take, it is a good chance for us to convey the exact message
as it is. During the press conference on Tamil Wiki contest, while many
magazin
Ravi,
while that is a good point, do you think the press still will take it? I
mean, it's not what they get, but what they put into the final print.
Regards,
On 13 April 2010 22:54, Ravishankar wrote:
> Hi Bishaka,
>
> Welcome to Wikipedia.
>
> No ill-feelings :) I have had similar misreporting
Hi Bishaka,
Welcome to Wikipedia.
No ill-feelings :) I have had similar misreporting experiences with media.
One way for better media management will be to take minutes during the
meeting and handing over a formal written press release to the media people.
We can also give contact numbers to cla
Bishakha Datta wrote:
>
> I feel the following misquotes/inaccuracies are somewhat damaging:
>
> *last para - the fictional quote on 'Malayalam articles having more
> depth.' I don't recall anyone saying this, let alone me.
well, do math ;-)
probably not that much damaging ;-)
--
praveenp
_
You are more generous than me in forgiving the DNA reporter for saying
dictionary for what the whole world knows is an encyclopedia.:)
I feel the following misquotes/inaccuracies are somewhat damaging:
*para 2 - which make it sound as if I am claiming leadership in India,
setting up the office and
Related news on DNA newspaper, Bangalore Ed, today
http://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report_wikipedia-now-has-an-indian-face_1370778
http://epaper.dnaindia.com/dnabangalore/epapermain.aspx Page 8 "
wikipedia-now-has-an-indian-face"
Forgive the reporter for the artcile saying "online collaborative