Mr. PonyTail is at it again, yaay!
On a serious note, despite everything he has ever said and done, the article
in his name doesn't carry anything slanderous or unacceptable. That is the
true achievement of Wikipedia and its user. I just skimmed through the
article: it is semi protected and the
Rohini,
We have to remain neutral right?
We can't help it if he or his organisation indulges in hooliganism or fraud?
Then in that case yes, I personally will add such data, with refs from ToI,
Hindu et all.
But we have to be neutral.
If you notice, several of the refs from the IIPM article are
The Sunday Indian magazine on its recent cover story heavily bashes
Wikipedia, Google etc.
The article also features an interview with Jay Walsh, Wikimedia
Foundation’s Head of Communications.
*Some background : *
The publication is supported by Arindam Chaudhuri , Head of IIPM, who was
heavily
As an editor and a member of the counter vandalism group, I personally find
this ignoramus statement by IIPM insulting. Clearly, he has absolutely NO
idea, how hard we work on keeping Wikipedia clean. Tell him to go thru the
edits made by any Indian editor using Huggle or Lupins Anti Vandal tool.