Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Research banner

2011-12-09 Thread Fae
I have raised my concerns for this appearing to be an advert on IRC with RCOM the DEV team and then on-wiki with Philippe. RCOM have pointed me to the WMF and the WMF said it's not their problem and pointed me back to RCOM. There is a claim that the central notice was agreed with the community but

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Research banner

2011-12-09 Thread Richard Symonds
Harry, Some of the issues I've seen brought up that I think are interesting points: . What if it was Microsoft, or Google, that was running this research, rather than Harvard University? Would we have their logos on the front page too? What if it was Mozilla, or the Free Software

[Wikimediauk-l] Editing sessions in the new year

2011-12-09 Thread Richard Symonds
All, There's been an awful lot of fundraiser emails coming in from donors who are asking about how to edit. The following statements aren't direct quotes - I've reworded them for privacy's sake, but they're 'based on a true story' and indicative of the sort of emails we're getting: Some of

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Editing sessions in the new year

2011-12-09 Thread HJ Mitchell
This is basically what we've been doing with the Girl Geeks. I'd be more than happy to help out. If possible, it would be good to put it in a location that's easiest to get to for most of the 'customers'. Or perhaps holding several and making sure we're nice and geographically diverse. Harry 

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Research banner

2011-12-09 Thread Thomas Dalton
On 9 December 2011 02:57, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: None whatsoever. It falls outside of the fundraising agreement, since fundraising banners are now turned off for logged-in users, and we don't have any control over what's displayed using CentralNotice aside from the

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Research banner

2011-12-09 Thread Michael Peel
On 9 Dec 2011, at 19:44, Thomas Dalton wrote: On 9 December 2011 02:57, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: None whatsoever. It falls outside of the fundraising agreement, since fundraising banners are now turned off for logged-in users, and we don't have any control over

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Research banner

2011-12-09 Thread Thomas Dalton
On 9 December 2011 19:48, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: My apologies; I misunderstood the situation. They've been turned off for some other countries, but they're still on for UK logged-in users at the moment (I gather they'll be turned off soon). So this banner was

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Editing sessions in the new year

2011-12-09 Thread James Forrester
On 9 December 2011 19:36, HJ Mitchell hjmitch...@ymail.com wrote: This is basically what we've been doing with the Girl Geeks. I'd be more than happy to help out. If possible, it would be good to put it in a location that's easiest to get to for most of the 'customers'. Or perhaps holding

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Editing sessions in the new year

2011-12-09 Thread Charles Matthews
On 9 December 2011 20:08, James Forrester ja...@jdforrester.org wrote: This sounds like a great idea. I'd love to help out running a few of these in the South-East/London; might be sensible to get a rough feel of distribution to work out how many (and how widespread) we'd want them to be...

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Editing sessions in the new year

2011-12-09 Thread HJ Mitchell
My experience of running similar events for WMUK is that if it has WiFi and chairs, we can make it work. A basement could work well if it meets those two criteria. Harry  From: Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com To:

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Research banner

2011-12-09 Thread Chris Keating
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote: On 9 December 2011 19:48, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote: My apologies; I misunderstood the situation. They've been turned off for some other countries, but they're still on for UK logged-in users