Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Imperial War Museum, meetings with Wikimedia UK

2017-07-28 Thread Harry Mitchell
Fae, The connection would appear to be that your communications were perceived as hostile, threatening, and passive-aggressive and that Wikimedia UK lost a potential partnership as a result - a recurring theme with your involvement within Wikimedia UK. And now you're discussing using similar

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Imperial War Museum, meetings with Wikimedia UK

2017-07-28 Thread Chris Keating
Though if you do happen to dig it out, it would not be appropriate to discuss the contents on a public list. On 28 Jul 2017 22:08, "Chris Keating" wrote: > You might refer to, inter alia, my email to you of 8.39pm on 21 May 2013. > > Regards, > > Chris > > On Fri,

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Imperial War Museum, meetings with Wikimedia UK

2017-07-28 Thread
Hi Chris, I don't see the connection between my membership of the charity and these claims being made publicly now, by a past employee, about critical feedback from the IWM. No I don't know what was said in those meetings, and it would be a surprise if as a fellow trustee you knew about this

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Imperial War Museum, meetings with Wikimedia UK

2017-07-28 Thread Chris Keating
apologies, strike the "forwarding private correspondence" bit. My point stands, nonetheless... On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Chris Keating wrote: > Oh god really Fae? > > The Board finally agreed to accept your membership application, no > doubt persuaded water had

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Imperial War Museum, meetings with Wikimedia UK

2017-07-28 Thread Chris Keating
Oh god really Fae? The Board finally agreed to accept your membership application, no doubt persuaded water had passed under the bridge, and bygones were now bygones. Then within weeks you are forwarding private correspondence to this list and "demanding answers" about things that happened in

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Imperial War Museum, meetings with Wikimedia UK

2017-07-28 Thread Stevie Benton
This is hilarious. As someone who was around at the time, all I can do is shake my head and laugh at the inevitability of this kind of conversation. WMUK would be ill-advised to allow a partnership of this importance to be frittered away in this manner. Que sera, sera. I write with no hat on

[Wikimediauk-l] Imperial War Museum, meetings with Wikimedia UK

2017-07-28 Thread
Could WMUK do a little research on this please? If this feedback on my correspondence with the Imperial War Museum was received from the IWM during meetings with employees of the charity in January 2013, this happened when I was a trustee on the board. I do not recall feedback like this getting