Sigh. To the old-school eye this is a {{sofixit}}. The conventional wisdom,
which is that no more need be said, holds good.
Charles___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
On 17 December 2017 at 17:36, Robin Owain wrote:
> What you're asking, Andy, is for me to have faith that the person who added
> 'UK' did not know that Wales existed?
No. What I'm asking you to do - in the absence of any evidence to the
contrary - is to assume that their
On the statement 'Welsh Chapels ID', you would expect a person to add the
specific property, namely 'Wales'. That would have been the correct thing to do.
What you're asking, Andy, is for me to have faith that the person who added
'UK' did not know that Wales existed? It is very reasonable to
On 15 December 2017 at 19:39, Robin Owain wrote:
> Very, very sad, however, that someone has opted for an union jack / uk
> template
> for properties relevant to the Welsh Nation (see the Talk pages); very
> political
Assume good faith, please. The reason for that was
Good to see these dbs uploaded and many thanks to all.
Very, very sad, however, that someone has opted for an union jack / uk template
for properties relevant to the Welsh Nation (see the Talk pages); very
political - and the best way to turn off any Welsh people away from Wikidata
and
Hi folks,
In the past few days, the following Wales-related properties have been
created in Wikidata:
Welsh Chapels ID - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4641
Welsh assembly ID - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4651
Coflein ID -