This is a test message to see if my email from this address gets through to the
list or not. If it does, then yay my problem with posting to this list is
fixed, and please accept my apologies for the spam. If it doesn't, then how did
you get hold of this message?!
Thanks,
Mike
Oh, cool, this came straight through. :-) I no longer need to use my work
address to send emails to this list - yay. :-) Apologies again for the spam!
Thanks,
Mike
On 8 May 2014, at 21:12, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
This is a test message to see if my email from this address gets
No problem Mike! I received it :-)
On 8 May 2014 21:14, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Oh, cool, this came straight through. :-) I no longer need to use my work
address to send emails to this list - yay. :-) Apologies again for the spam!
Thanks,
Mike
On 8 May 2014, at 21:12,
testing new email configuration. apologies!
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
It works!
On 13 April 2012 19:18, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.ukwrote:
testing new email configuration. apologies!
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Edward at Logic Museum
edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
I'm still awaiting clarification from the Board about whether they are
taking collective responsibility for the *wording* of the announcement here
You may wish to check the definition of harassment (
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/stalking_and_harassment/#a02a) You
can see here that the Crown Prosecution Service defines harassment as
causing alarm or distress as well as the more traditional putting people
in fear of violence
This is a test message to see if I have the right of reply to some of the more
allegations made here, about me.
Edward___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
On 10 January 2012 18:50, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
This is a test message to see if I have the right of reply to some of the
more allegations made here, about me.
I have received your email, so yes, you can still post here. I would
ask that you keep your response
I don't think it's productive (or helpful) to have a discussion like this
on a public mailing list, and would ask that if people have comments on
this, that they be directed to i...@wikimedia.org.uk. Bear in mind that
everyone concerned is a real person, so we need to keep discussions like
this
My apologies; I wasn't meaning to contradict Richard here. If this conversation
needs to be kept confidential due to privacy concerns, then using the
i...@wikimedia.org.uk address (emails to which are directed to OTRS rather than
solely to individuals) is also a good approach to take. I note
- Original Message -
From: Richard Symonds
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Test message
I don't think it's productive (or helpful) to have a discussion like this on
a public mailing list, and would ask
, January 10, 2012 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Test message
On 10 January 2012 22:33, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com
wrote:
Yes, bear in mind that I am a real person, and that your first email
message
outed me, and accused me of serious misbehaviour ('off wiki
On 10 January 2012 22:33, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
Symonds:
Bear in mind that everyone concerned is a real person, so we need to keep
discussions like this private to avoid anyone being outed, or accused of
misbehaviour, in a public forum.
Yes, bear in mind that I
mailing list is not a proper place for legally objectionable
allegations, surely.
Edward
- Original Message -
From: James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Test message
On 10
On 10 January 2012 23:06, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com wrote:
It's difficult to see how you can expect to be taken seriously, having
not even the courtesy to refer to Richard by more than an unadorned
surname (the height of rudeness, as I'm sure you are aware), seeming
not to
On 10 January 2012 23:07, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 January 2012 23:06, Edward at Logic Museum edw...@logicmuseum.com
wrote:
It's difficult to see how you can expect to be taken seriously, having
not even the courtesy to refer to Richard by more than an unadorned
On 10 January 2012 23:58, michael west michaw...@gmail.com wrote:
has everybody lost sense? Either the foundation has lost all sense of
reasoning to post public alleged allegations or you are happy to feed
trolls. Police if you can find proof, a county court to make a
restraining order or let
I'm still awaiting clarification from the Board about whether they are
taking collective responsibility for the *wording* of the announcement here
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediauk-l/2012-January/006977.html
..
And to clarify again, it's not the fact of a ban I am concerned
19 matches
Mail list logo
