Not under this ruling. The ruling adduces several features to establish
copying - as far as I remember
* A red bus
* A monochrome background
* A white (or clear) sky
* The riverside frontage of the HoP
* The top of the bus being in line with the top of the building
* The bus being framed by
That might actually be licensed, though.
--
Harry
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Richard Farmbrough rich...@farmbrough.co.uk
wrote:
I wonder if http://www.popartuk.com/**photography/london/red-bus-on-**
...photos that somehow look similar:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html
The servers are safe (well, relatively speaking) in the U.S., but
should people in the UK be concerned when uploading images?
Magnus
On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
...photos that somehow look similar:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html
Good heavens. That's bonkers; there's possibly a trademark
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:24 PM, James Forrester ja...@jdforrester.orgwrote:
On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com
wrote:
...photos that somehow look similar:
On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
...photos that somehow look similar:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html
The servers are safe (well, relatively speaking) in the U.S., but
