I second that. I eventually joined WMUK... but I have left several other
registered charities (who charge around £25 a year). These days, a
membership fee of £5 for a charity seems about right. At the Lansbury
Gardeners AGM today we increased the subscription from £1 to £5 per annum.
My
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Michael Peel wrote:
although I would hope that everyone subscribed to this list would be
interested in joining WMUK (and if you're not already a member, I'd love to
hear why not...).
Money. Having been unemployed for several years and now a student, money
is not
On 03/07/2011 16:10, Deryck Chan wrote:
Wherever we host it, the most important thing seems to be geo-targeted
notices. Where we host it doesn't actually matter, as long as we
publicise the link well.
That is obviously not the whole answer, if we want to appeal more
broadly than people
I think that multichannel marketing is the answer here. Watchlisting
and Geonotices may be our most effective way of communictaing these
events, but its important to use other channels as well such as the UK
mailing list. Also I sometimes drop a note on the talkpage of UK or
London based editors
On 3 Jul 2011, at 09:00, WereSpielChequers wrote:
I'd say that meta is the right place for meetup pages, but with
pubilicity from other projects that might be relevant.
Holding it on Wikipedia might be seen as limiting it to Wikipedians.
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I've moved the
Wherever we host it, the most important thing seems to be geo-targeted
notices. Where we host it doesn't actually matter, as long as we publicise
the link well.
On Jul 3, 2011 4:01 PM, WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd say that meta is the right place for meetup pages, but
On 2 July 2011 10:24, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out where the best place to do the online organisation of
wikimeets is. I can think of four different places, each with pros and cons,
which I'd appreciate others' views on.
[Snip]
3) Wikimedia UK
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:31, James Forrester ja...@jdforrester.org wrote:
I think meta is a good place (but then, I did move the London ones
there after a complaint from a non-enwiki-er, so I'm biased ;-)). I
also think the real value now we have SUL is not in the home but in
the advertising
On 2 Jul 2011, at 10:31, James Forrester wrote:
You missed out that it will only be seen by people that already know
that the wikimeets exist, or that Wikimedia UK does. We very
frequently get new people at the London meetups who had no idea that
the meetups existed, and certainly no idea
relevant messages. That way we can all
know how to find this stuff easily.
--Original Message--
From: Tom Morris
Sender: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
ReplyTo: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Wikimeets - best
On 2 July 2011 10:39, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
We should be getting more non-Wikipedia people involved and attending
events: because in-breeding isn't healthy.
And more non-techies, for the same reason.
- d.
___
Wikimedia UK mailing
Experience from being involved with London Wiki Wednesday and other
meetups is the consistency of information (date, time, place) at
different places, and where to sign up (if at all). London Wiki
Wednesday was harmed (in part) by the use SocialText and now seems
moribund.
London
12 matches
Mail list logo
