Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Broken link

2012-01-25 Thread Roger Bamkin
1. oops 2. Chris, I thought you told me when I applied that the nettles were required? 3. Welcome - you might be able to contain my typoos now Roger On 24 January 2012 23:44, Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote: On 24 January 2012 22:49, Andy Mabbett

[Wikimediauk-l] The new British standard for copyright infringement...

2012-01-25 Thread Magnus Manske
...photos that somehow look similar: http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html The servers are safe (well, relatively speaking) in the U.S., but should people in the UK be concerned when uploading images? Magnus

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] The new British standard for copyright infringement...

2012-01-25 Thread James Forrester
On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote: ...photos that somehow look similar: http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html Good heavens. That's bonkers; there's possibly a trademark

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] The new British standard for copyright infringement...

2012-01-25 Thread Harry Burt
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:24 PM, James Forrester ja...@jdforrester.orgwrote: On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote: ...photos that somehow look similar:

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] The new British standard for copyright infringement...

2012-01-25 Thread geni
On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote: ...photos that somehow look similar: http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html The servers are safe (well, relatively speaking) in the U.S., but