Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Process for admitting members

At 19:08 + 5/12/08, Thomas Dalton wrote: >2008/12/5 Gordon Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> At 11:35 + 4/12/08, Thomas Dalton wrote: >>> > I am sure there is some guesswork here. And yes, I agree, WMUK must be democratic. I am trying to suggest that making every "supportin

[Wikimediauk-l] Gift Aid - an update

Hi all, Just to keep you up to date regarding Gift Aid. I spoke to the HMRC Charities Unit today and asked them when we should expect a response. They said they are currently taking between 6-8 weeks so we should expect to hear around mid January. As we are not registered with the Charity Comm

[Wikimediauk-l] Size of board

I have started a discussion on what size future boards should be, please give your views on meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_UK_v2.0#Size_of_board ___ Wikimedia UK mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Process for admitting members

2008/12/5 Gordon Joly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 11:35 + 4/12/08, Thomas Dalton wrote: >> > I am sure there is some guesswork here. >>> >>> And yes, I agree, WMUK must be democratic. I am trying to suggest >>> that making every "supporting member" become a guarantor member (or >>> become not

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Process for admitting members

At 11:35 + 4/12/08, Thomas Dalton wrote: > > I am sure there is some guesswork here. >> >> And yes, I agree, WMUK must be democratic. I am trying to suggest >> that making every "supporting member" become a guarantor member (or >> become nothing) might not be the best way forward. > >No-one