I must say I'm pretty dubious about this approach for articles. I doubt
it can detect most of the typical problems with them - for example
all-online sources are
very often a warning sign, but may not be, or may be inevitable in a
topical subject. Most of Charles' factors below relate better
: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of John Byrne
Sent: 17 April 2014 13:46
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Rating Wikimedia content (was Our next, strategy
plan-Paid editing)
I must say I'm
Byrne
*Sent:* 17 April 2014 13:46
*To:* wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
*Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Rating Wikimedia content (was Our next,
strategy plan-Paid editing)
I must say I'm pretty dubious about this approach for articles. I doubt
it can detect most of the typical problems
-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Edward Saperia
Sent: 17 April 2014 14:48
To: UK Wikimedia mailing list
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Rating Wikimedia content (was Our next, strategy
plan-Paid editing)
It's interesting to think that in most circumstances, good online content
...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Rod Ward
Sent: 17 April 2014 14:56
To: 'UK Wikimedia mailing list'
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Rating Wikimedia content (was Our next, strategy
plan-Paid editing)
Many projects have installed a “popular pages” tool highlighting which of the
pages
...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:
wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] *On Behalf Of *Edward Saperia
*Sent:* 17 April 2014 14:48
*To:* UK Wikimedia mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Rating Wikimedia content (was Our next,
strategy plan-Paid editing)
It's interesting to think that in most
On 17 April 2014 13:46, John Byrne j...@bodkinprints.co.uk wrote:
snip
Most of Charles' factors below relate better to views and
controversialness than article quality, and
article quality has a limited ability to increase views, as study of FAs
before and after expansion will show.
I was
On 17 April 2014 14:48, Edward Saperia e...@wikimanialondon.org wrote:
I always find it a bit of a shame that viewership figures are hidden away
in an unpublicised tool (https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/). I
would have though seeing how many people view a page would be very
motivating
Aha - not very discoverable though!
*Edward Saperia*
Creative Director Original Content Londonhttp://www.originalcontentlondon.com
email e...@originalcontentlondon.com •
facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/edsaperia
• twitter http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia • 07796955572
133-135 Bethnal Green Road,
