Thomas Dalton wrote:
Check this out: http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6032750
It's about social media and education, which is an interesting topic
in itself, but most importantly it contains this line:
Wikis are web pages that can be easily edited, the most famous of
which is
geni wrote:
Well so far everything you have described would risk getting you
blocked from wikipedia.
Probably the most important thing to do is to contact
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects
first.
I don't want to pull rank on this (much), but I have
2010/1/10 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
geni wrote:
Well so far everything you have described would risk getting you
blocked from wikipedia.
Probably the most important thing to do is to contact
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects
first.
2010/1/10 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2010/1/10 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
geni wrote:
Well so far everything you have described would risk getting you
blocked from wikipedia.
Probably the most important thing to do is to contact
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2010/1/10 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2010/1/10 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
geni wrote:
Well so far everything you have described would risk getting you
blocked from wikipedia.
Probably the most important thing to do is to contact
2010/1/10 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Shrug. Admins are never obliged to enforce policy if it gives a stupid
result. ArbCom are obliged to make some sense out of what the policy
pages say, bearing in mind the good of the mission. Asking for 1500
admins to come up with a
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 18:34 +, Thomas Dalton wrote:
2010/1/10 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Shrug. Admins are never obliged to enforce policy if it gives a stupid
result. ArbCom are obliged to make some sense out of what the policy
pages say, bearing in mind the good
Brian McNeil wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 18:34 +, Thomas Dalton wrote:
2010/1/10 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Shrug. Admins are never obliged to enforce policy if it gives a stupid
result. ArbCom are obliged to make some sense out of what the policy
pages
Thomas Dalton wrote:
Check this out: http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6032750
It's about social media and education, which is an interesting topic
in itself, but most importantly it contains this line:
Wikis are web pages that can be easily edited, the most famous of
which is
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com
Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 11:09 AM
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Schoolchildren told to avoidWikipedia-Telegraph
Thomas Dalton wrote:
Check this out: http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6032750
It's about social media
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Charles Matthews wrote:
The point (for the guide that Brian and I are apparently writing) is
that empowerment is a good buzzword, but there is a small, treacherous
area to explore from a teachers' point of view: accounts for minors
should not give personal details, so a
2010/1/9 Chris McKenna cmcke...@sucs.org:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Charles Matthews wrote:
The point (for the guide that Brian and I are apparently writing) is
that empowerment is a good buzzword, but there is a small, treacherous
area to explore from a teachers' point of view: accounts for minors
2010/1/9 Steve Virgin st...@mediafocusuk.com:
Another thought
Is the WMFoundation putting out a press release saying 'thanks' to the
thousands of donors who have helped it to hit its global fund raising
targets?
If it isn't, shouldn't we be doing it?
I'm not sure about a press release.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Steve Virgin st...@mediafocusuk.com wrote:
Another thought
Is the WMFoundation putting out a press release saying 'thanks' to the
thousands of donors who have helped it to hit its global fund raising
targets?
Well, there's a massive banner on Wikipedia
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2010/1/9 Chris McKenna cmcke...@sucs.org:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Charles Matthews wrote:
The point (for the guide that Brian and I are apparently writing) is
that empowerment is a good buzzword, but there is a small, treacherous
area to explore from a teachers'
2010/1/9 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2010/1/9 Chris McKenna cmcke...@sucs.org:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Charles Matthews wrote:
The point (for the guide that Brian and I are apparently writing) is
that empowerment is a good buzzword, but there is a
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 21:14 +, geni wrote:
2010/1/9 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2010/1/9 Chris McKenna cmcke...@sucs.org:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Charles Matthews wrote:
The point (for the guide that Brian and I are apparently writing) is
On 9 Jan 2010, at 21:14, geni wrote:
2010/1/9 Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2010/1/9 Chris McKenna cmcke...@sucs.org:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Charles Matthews wrote:
The point (for the guide that Brian and I are apparently
writing) is
that
The Times Educational Supplement contacted WMUK today about the
ofqual guidance, with an urgent deadline to meet (2.30pm). I
explained to them that the information they provide is good, and that
Wikipedia is a great starting point, and a stepping stone to learning
more (emphasising the
Check this out: http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6032750
It's about social media and education, which is an interesting topic
in itself, but most importantly it contains this line:
Wikis are web pages that can be easily edited, the most famous of
which is Wikipedia, the world's
20 matches
Mail list logo
