2009/9/21 Andrew Turvey andrewrtur...@googlemail.com:
- WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm more concerned about what happens when something is posted to our
site that is unfair, inaccurate and full of malice. Presumably
Wikimedia in the US is the publisher
I
Hi all,
The following might be of interest:
Defamation on the internet: Ministry of Justice seeks your views:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/newsrelease160909a.htm
Plan to update libel law for web:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8259814.stm
Summary: A debate on aspects of defamation law, and
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/17 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
Plan to update libel law for web:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8259814.stm
Does anyone know what this means?
Publishers of online archives and blogs might also be
2009/9/17 Sam Blacketer sam.blacke...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/9/17 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
Plan to update libel law for web:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8259814.stm
Does anyone know what this means?
I'm more concerned about what happens when something is posted to our
site that is unfair, inaccurate and full of malice. Presumably
Wikimedia in the US is the publisher, But what happens if you mark an
article as patrolled or an edit as flagged without checking that an
earlier revision elsewhere
At 17:32 +0100 17/9/09, Sam Blacketer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Thomas Dalton
mailto:thomas.dal...@gmail.comthomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/17 Michael Peel mailto:em...@mikepeel.netem...@mikepeel.net:
Plan to update libel law for web:
2009/9/17 WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@googlemail.com:
I'm more concerned about what happens when something is posted to our
site that is unfair, inaccurate and full of malice. Presumably
Wikimedia in the US is the publisher, But what happens if you mark an
article as patrolled or an
